Huettenbrenner Simone, Maier Susanne, Leisser Christina, Polgar Doris, Strasser Stephan, Grusch Michael, Krupitza Georg
Institute of Clinical Pathology, University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Mutat Res. 2003 Jun;543(3):235-49. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5742(02)00110-2.
One of the hallmarks of multicellularity is that the individual cellular fate is sacrificed for the benefit of a higher order of life-the organism. The accidental death of cells in a multicellular organism results in swelling and membrane-rupture and inevitably spills cell contents into the surrounding tissue with deleterious effects for the organism. To avoid this form of necrotic death the cells of metazoans have developed complex self-destruction mechanisms, collectively called programmed cell death, which see to an orderly removal of superfluous cells. Since evolution never invents new genes but plays variations on old themes by DNA mutations, it is not surprising, that some of the genes involved in metazoan death pathways apparently have evolved from homologues in unicellular organisms, where they originally had different functions. Interestingly some unicellular protozoans have developed a primitive form of non-necrotic cell death themselves, which could mean that the idea of an altruistic death for the benefit of genetically identical cells predated the invention of multicellularity. The cell death pathways of protozoans, however, show no homology to those in metazoans, where several death pathways seem to have evolved in parallel. Mitochondria stands at the beginning of several death pathways and also determines, whether a cell has sufficient energy to complete a death program. However, the endosymbiotic bacterial ancestors of mitochondria are unlikely to have contributed to the recent mitochondrial death machinery and therefore, these components may derive from mutated eukaryotic precursors and might have invaded the respective mitochondrial compartments. Although there is no direct evidence, it seems that the prokaryotic-eukaryotic symbiosis created the space necessary for sophisticated death mechanisms on command, which in their distinct forms are major factors for the evolution of multicellular organisms.
多细胞生物的一个标志是,为了更高层次的生命——生物体的利益,个体细胞的命运被牺牲。多细胞生物中细胞的意外死亡会导致肿胀和细胞膜破裂,不可避免地将细胞内容物泄漏到周围组织中,对生物体产生有害影响。为了避免这种坏死形式的死亡,后生动物的细胞已经发展出复杂的自我毁灭机制,统称为程序性细胞死亡,这种机制负责有序地清除多余的细胞。由于进化从不创造新基因,而是通过DNA突变对旧有基因进行变异,因此毫不奇怪,一些参与后生动物死亡途径的基因显然是从单细胞生物中的同源基因进化而来的,在单细胞生物中它们最初具有不同的功能。有趣的是,一些单细胞原生动物自身也发展出了一种原始形式的非坏死性细胞死亡,这可能意味着为了基因相同的细胞的利益而进行利他性死亡的概念早于多细胞生物的出现。然而,原生动物的细胞死亡途径与后生动物的细胞死亡途径没有同源性,后生动物的几种死亡途径似乎是平行进化的。线粒体处于几种死亡途径的起始位置,并且还决定细胞是否有足够的能量来完成死亡程序。然而,线粒体的内共生细菌祖先不太可能对最近的线粒体死亡机制有所贡献,因此,这些成分可能源自突变的真核生物前体,并且可能侵入了各自的线粒体区室。虽然没有直接证据,但似乎原核生物与真核生物的共生关系为按需运行的复杂死亡机制创造了必要的空间,这些机制以其独特的形式是多细胞生物进化的主要因素。