Suppr超能文献

内镜超声引导下胰腺细针穿刺抽吸术。诊断效用与准确性。

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the pancreas. Diagnostic utility and accuracy.

作者信息

Afify Alaa M, al-Khafaji Basim M, Kim Byungki, Scheiman James M

机构信息

Departments of Pathology and Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Acta Cytol. 2003 May-Jun;47(3):341-8. doi: 10.1159/000326531.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNAB) is regarded as a safe and reliable procedure for diagnosing and staging of pancreatic neoplasms. This study retrospectively evaluated both the diagnostic utility and accuracy of pancreatic EUS-FNABs and potential cytologic pitfalls when using Diff-Quik stain for on-site evaluation.

STUDY DESIGN

Pancreatic EUS-FNABs performed between 1995 and 1998 were identified from the files of the Department of Pathology. All patients were studied via a linear-array ultrasound endoscope with an FNAB device. Immediate evaluation of the specimen by a pathologist using air-dried slides and Diff-Quik stain was done on all cases. An average of five passes (range, three to nine) were performed. Five cytologic categories were identified: nondiagnostic, benign, atypical, suspicious and malignant. EUS disease staging, histologic correlation and clinical follow-up were reviewed.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine consecutive pancreative FNABs were evaluated in the study period. The patients comprised 38 females and 31 males with a mean age of 65 years (range, 36-83). Histologic correlation was available on 40 patients, and follow-up was available on the remaining 29. The cytologic diagnoses included: 31 malignant, 8 suspicious, 6 atypical, 20 benign and 4 nondiagnostic. Forty-three cases were true positive, 9 were true negative, 2 were false positive, and 11 were false negative. The overall sensitivity was 80% and specificity was 82%.

CONCLUSION

The study showed that cytologic evaluation of pancreatic EUS-FNABs has 80% sensitivity and 82% specificity. False negative diagnosis was usually due to sampling error. A nondiagnostic cytologic diagnosis should be rendered in the absence of adequate sampling of a lesion. On-site cytologic evaluation of EUS-FNABs aids in guaranteeing specimen adequacy, and the pathologist should be trained to evaluate Diff-Quik-stained samples.

摘要

目的

内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS - FNAB)被认为是诊断胰腺肿瘤及进行分期的一种安全可靠的方法。本研究回顾性评估了胰腺EUS - FNAB的诊断效用、准确性以及在使用Diff - Quik染色进行现场评估时潜在的细胞学陷阱。

研究设计

从病理科档案中识别出1995年至1998年间进行的胰腺EUS - FNAB病例。所有患者均通过配备FNAB装置的线阵超声内镜进行检查。所有病例均由病理学家使用风干玻片和Diff - Quik染色对标本进行即时评估。平均进行5次穿刺(范围为3至9次)。确定了5种细胞学类别:无法诊断、良性、非典型、可疑和恶性。回顾了EUS疾病分期、组织学相关性及临床随访情况。

结果

在研究期间共评估了69例连续的胰腺FNAB病例。患者包括38名女性和31名男性,平均年龄65岁(范围为36 - 83岁)。40例患者有组织学相关性资料,其余29例有随访资料。细胞学诊断包括:31例恶性、8例可疑、6例非典型、20例良性和4例无法诊断。43例为真阳性,9例为真阴性,2例为假阳性,11例为假阴性。总体敏感性为80%,特异性为82%。

结论

该研究表明,胰腺EUS - FNAB的细胞学评估敏感性为80%,特异性为82%。假阴性诊断通常是由于采样误差。在未对病变进行充分采样时应做出无法诊断的细胞学诊断。EUS - FNAB的现场细胞学评估有助于确保标本充足,病理学家应接受评估Diff - Quik染色样本的培训。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验