Charter Richard A
Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Long Beach Healthcare System, California 90822, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 2003 Jul;59(7):787-90. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10172.
This article highlights some dangers inherent in interpreting individual examinee strengths and weaknesses in WAIS-III and WISC-III profiles. In both manuals, there are tables providing point estimates for determining if a significant difference exists when comparing one subtest to the average of several subtests. However, these point estimates may lead to interpretation errors. A confidence interval approach that provides a solution to the interpretation problem is described and illustrated. These intervals show that differences between a single subtest score and the average subtest score that just reach statistical significance carry the potential of having no clinical significance.
本文强调了在解释韦氏成人智力量表第三版(WAIS - III)和韦氏儿童智力量表第三版(WISC - III)剖面图中个体受测者的优势和劣势时所固有的一些危险。在这两本手册中,都有表格提供点估计值,用于在将一个子测验与几个子测验的平均值进行比较时确定是否存在显著差异。然而,这些点估计值可能会导致解释错误。本文描述并举例说明了一种能解决解释问题的置信区间方法。这些区间表明,单个子测验分数与子测验平均分数之间刚刚达到统计学显著性的差异可能没有临床意义。