Tsirikos Athanasios I, Chang Wei-Ning, Dabney K W, Miller Freeman
Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Delaware 19899, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jun 15;28(12):1300-5. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000065572.10824.AB.
A retrospective study was performed including 45 pediatric patients with spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy and neuromuscular scoliosis who underwent anteroposterior spinal fusion.
To evaluate the outcomes and complications of one-stage and two-stage combined anteroposterior spine fusion and to document which procedure is more efficacious and provides better results.
Circumferential spinal arthrodesis has been proven to achieve better scoliotic curve correction, decreasing significantly the risk of pseudarthrosis and progression of the deformity. There have been a few studies comparing same-day versus staged anteroposterior spinal surgery in mixed populations with neuromuscular scoliosis, but not in an isolated group of pediatric patients with spastic cerebral palsy.
The medical records and radiographs of all patients were reviewed, and the results were statistically analyzed. The complications were divided into medical, subcategorized into major and minor, and technical.
There was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) between one-stage (Group 1) and two-stage (Group 2) patients, considering age at surgery, preoperative scoliosis angle, pelvic obliquity, kyphosis angle, lordosis angle, levels of anterior release, percentage of scoliosis correction, radiographic follow-up, hospitalization time, and intensive care unit stay. Sequentially performed spinal procedures (Group 1) were associated with increased intraoperative blood loss, prolonged operative time, and a considerably higher incidence of medical and technical complications, including two perioperative deaths.
Two-stage anteroposterior spinal fusion provides safer and more consistent results with several advantages over the single-stage procedure in the management of patients with cerebral palsy and neuromuscular scoliosis.
进行了一项回顾性研究,纳入了45例患有痉挛性四肢瘫脑瘫和神经肌肉型脊柱侧弯并接受了前后路脊柱融合术的儿科患者。
评估一期和二期联合前后路脊柱融合术的疗效和并发症,并记录哪种手术更有效且能提供更好的结果。
环周脊柱融合术已被证明能实现更好的脊柱侧弯矫正,显著降低假关节形成和畸形进展的风险。已有一些研究比较了在患有神经肌肉型脊柱侧弯的混合人群中同日与分期进行的前后路脊柱手术,但未针对患有痉挛性脑瘫的儿科患者单独分组进行研究。
回顾了所有患者的病历和X光片,并对结果进行了统计分析。并发症分为医疗相关并发症(再细分为严重和轻微并发症)和技术相关并发症。
在手术年龄、术前脊柱侧弯角度、骨盆倾斜度、后凸角度、前凸角度、前路松解节段、脊柱侧弯矫正百分比、影像学随访、住院时间和重症监护病房停留时间方面,一期手术组(第1组)和二期手术组(第2组)患者之间无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。依次进行的脊柱手术(第1组)与术中出血量增加、手术时间延长以及医疗和技术并发症发生率显著更高相关,包括两例围手术期死亡。
在脑瘫和神经肌肉型脊柱侧弯患者的治疗中,二期前后路脊柱融合术提供了更安全、更一致的结果,与一期手术相比具有若干优势。