Suppr超能文献

巴甫洛夫学会过去与现在使命的根源:巴甫洛夫维度。

Roots of the Pavlovian Society's missions of the past and present: the Pavlov dimension.

作者信息

Furedy John J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Integr Physiol Behav Sci. 2003 Jan-Mar;38(1):3-16. doi: 10.1007/BF02734257.

Abstract

This paper offers an interpretation of the relation between Pavlov's life and work and the missions of the Pavlovian Society, both past ("observation and observation") and present ("interdisciplinary research on the integrated organism"). I begin with an account of Pavlov's life and his influence on contemporary thought. I then indicate the relation of some of Pavlov's attitudes (e.g., his motto, his epistemological stance) to the Society's past mission. In the concluding and most controversial section, I argue for six guiding principles derived from Pavlov, to be applied to the Society's mission. These are: (a) a confident methodological behaviorism; (b) a significant role assigned to both physiological and psychological factors in the prediction and control of the integrated organism; (c) approximately equal taxonomic precision of physiological and psychological explanatory concepts; (d) distrust of teleological explanatory concepts; (e) rejection of psychology's instrumentalist "cognitive paradigm shift"; and (f) rejection of the representational theory of knowledge.

摘要

本文对巴甫洛夫的生活与工作之间的关系以及巴甫洛夫学会过去(“观察与观察”)和现在(“对整体有机体的跨学科研究”)的使命进行了解读。我首先讲述了巴甫洛夫的生平及其对当代思想的影响。然后我指出了巴甫洛夫的一些态度(例如,他的座右铭、他的认识论立场)与学会过去使命的关系。在结论部分也是最具争议的部分,我提出了源自巴甫洛夫的六项指导原则,以应用于学会的使命。这些原则是:(a)一种自信的方法论行为主义;(b)在对整体有机体的预测和控制中赋予生理和心理因素同等重要的作用;(c)生理和心理解释概念在分类学上的精确程度大致相等;(d)对目的论解释概念的不信任;(e)拒绝心理学的工具主义“认知范式转变”;(f)拒绝知识的表征理论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验