Taylor Charles T, Byrd Debbie C, Krueger Kem
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Harrison School of Pharmacy, 108 Walker Building, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003 Jun 1;60(11):1123-9. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/60.11.1123.
The effect of pharmaceutical care on the prevention, detection, and resolution of medication-related problems in high-risk patients in a rural community was studied. Adult patients who received care at clinics in a medically underserved area of Alabama and who were identified as being at high risk of medication-related adverse events were randomly assigned to a control group or an intervention group. The control group received standard medical care, and the intervention group received pharmaceutical care, including a medical record review, a medication history review, pharmacotherapeutic evaluation, and patient medication education and monitoring over a one-year period. A total of 69 patients completed the study (33 in the intervention group and 36 in the control group). The percentage of patients responding to hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and anticoagulation therapy increased significantly in the intervention group and declined in the control group. Ratings for inappropriate prescribing improved in all 10 domains evaluated in the intervention group but worsened in 5 domains in the control group. There were no significant differences between the groups at 12 months in health-related quality of life or medication misadventures. Medication compliance scores improved in the intervention group but not in the control group. Medication knowledge increased in the intervention group and decreased in the control group. Pharmaceutical care in a rural, community-based setting appeared to reduce inappropriate prescribing, enhance disease management, and improve medication compliance and knowledge without adversely affecting health-related quality of life.
本研究探讨了药学服务对农村社区高危患者药物相关问题的预防、发现及解决的影响。在阿拉巴马州医疗服务欠缺地区的诊所接受治疗且被确定有药物相关不良事件高风险的成年患者,被随机分配至对照组或干预组。对照组接受标准医疗服务,干预组接受药学服务,包括病历审查、用药史审查、药物治疗评估,以及为期一年的患者用药教育和监测。共有69名患者完成了研究(干预组33名,对照组36名)。干预组中对高血压、糖尿病、血脂异常及抗凝治疗有反应的患者百分比显著增加,而对照组则下降。干预组评估的所有10个领域中不适当处方的评分均有所改善,而对照组有5个领域恶化。两组在12个月时与健康相关的生活质量或用药意外方面无显著差异。干预组的用药依从性评分提高,而对照组未提高。干预组的用药知识增加,对照组减少。在农村社区环境中提供药学服务似乎可减少不适当处方,加强疾病管理,提高用药依从性和知识水平,且不会对与健康相关的生活质量产生不利影响。