Beauchemin K A, Yang W Z, Morgavi D P, Ghorbani G R, Kautz W, Leedle J A Z
Research Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, T1J 4B1, Canada.
J Anim Sci. 2003 Jun;81(6):1628-40. doi: 10.2527/2003.8161628x.
Two studies were conducted to determine whether a bacterial direct-fed microbial (DFM) alone or with yeast could minimize the risk of acidosis and improve feed utilization in feedlot cattle receiving high-concentrate diets. Eight ruminally cannulated steers, previously adapted to a high-concentrate diet, were used in crossover designs to study the effects of DFM on feed intake, ruminal pH, ruminal fermentation, blood characteristics, site and extent of digestion, and microbial protein synthesis. Steers were provided ad libitum access to a diet containing steam-rolled barley, barley silage, and a protein-mineral supplement (87, 8, and 5% on a DM basis, respectively). In Exp. 1, treatments were control vs. the lactic-acid producing bacterium Enterococcus faecium EF212 (EF; 6 x 10(9) cfu/d). In Exp. 2, treatments were control vs EF (6 x 10(9) cfu/d) and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae; 6 x 10(9) cfu/d). Supplementing feedlot cattle diets with EF in Exp. 1 increased (P < 0.05) propionate and (P < 0.05) decreased butyrate concentrations, decreased the nadir of ruminal pH (P < 0.05), enhanced the flow of feed N (P < 0.10) to the duodenum but reduced that of microbial N (P < 0.10), reduced (P < 0.10) intestinal digestion of NDF, and increased (P < 0.10) fecal coliform numbers. Other than the increase in propionate concentrations that signify an increase in energy precursors for growth, the other metabolic changes were generally considered to be undesirable. In Exp. 2, providing EF together with yeast abolished most of these undesirable effects. Combining EF with yeast increased the DM digestion of corn grain incubated in sacco, but there were no effects on altering the site or extent of nutrient digestion. The diets used in this study were highly fermentable, and the incidence of subclinical ruminal acidosis, defined as steers with ruminal pH below 5.5 for prolonged periods of time, was high. Supplementing the diet with EF, with or without yeast, had limited effects on reducing ruminal acidosis. It seems that cattle adapted to high-grain diets are able to maintain relatively high feed intake and high fiber digestion despite low ruminal pH. The Enterococcus faecium bacterium and yeast used in this study were of limited value for feedlot cattle already adapted to high-grain diets.
进行了两项研究,以确定单独使用细菌直接投喂微生物(DFM)或与酵母联用,是否能够将酸中毒风险降至最低,并提高接受高浓度日粮的育肥牛的饲料利用率。八头安装了瘤胃瘘管的阉牛,之前已适应高浓度日粮,采用交叉设计来研究DFM对采食量、瘤胃pH值、瘤胃发酵、血液特征、消化部位和程度以及微生物蛋白质合成的影响。给阉牛随意提供一种日粮,该日粮包含蒸汽压片大麦、大麦青贮料和一种蛋白质矿物质补充剂(分别以干物质计为87%、8%和5%)。在实验1中,处理方式为对照组与产乳酸的粪肠球菌EF212(EF;6×10⁹ cfu/天)。在实验2中,处理方式为对照组与EF(6×10⁹ cfu/天)和酵母(酿酒酵母;6×10⁹ cfu/天)。在实验1中,给育肥牛日粮补充EF增加了(P < 0.05)丙酸浓度且(P < 0.05)降低了丁酸浓度,降低了瘤胃pH值的最低点(P < 0.05),提高了饲料氮向十二指肠的流量(P < 0.10)但降低了微生物氮的流量(P < 0.10),降低了(P < 0.10)中性洗涤纤维的肠道消化率,并增加了(P < 0.10)粪便中大肠菌群数量。除了丙酸浓度增加表明生长所需能量前体增加外,其他代谢变化通常被认为是不利的。在实验2中,将EF与酵母一起使用消除了大部分这些不利影响。将EF与酵母联合使用增加了瘤胃内玉米籽粒的干物质消化率,但对改变养分消化的部位或程度没有影响。本研究中使用的日粮具有高度可发酵性,亚临床瘤胃酸中毒(定义为瘤胃pH值长时间低于5.5的阉牛)的发生率很高。给日粮补充EF,无论有无酵母,对降低瘤胃酸中毒的作用有限。似乎适应高谷物日粮的牛,尽管瘤胃pH值较低,仍能够保持相对较高的采食量和较高的纤维消化率。本研究中使用的粪肠球菌和酵母,对于已经适应高谷物日粮的育肥牛价值有限。