Zanardi Romeo, Del Frate Chiara, Zuiani Chiara, Del Frate Giovanni, Bazzocchi Massimo
Istituto di Radiologia, Università degli Studi di Udine, Udine, Italy.
Radiol Med. 2003 Apr;105(4):326-38.
To introduce a staging of pelvic endometriosis based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) features, compared with the American Fertility Society (AFS) laparoscopic classification.
Thirty-five consecutive females with clinically suspected endometriosis underwent MRI examination using TSE T1, T2W, and SE FAT-SAT T1W sequences, to demonstrate the presence of endometriomas and pelvic implants. Laparoscopy was performed within two weeks (mean 8 days) of the examination. A radiologist experienced in pelvic pathology evaluated the presence of endometriomas and implants and calculated a score to classify endometriosis in four classes, comparable with those of AFS laparoscopic staging. The MRI score was based on size, edges, wall thickness, septations, signal intensity on T2-weighted images of endometriomas and presence of pelvic implants. The concordance between MRI and laparoscopic classification was evaluated using k-statistics.
Laparoscopy confirmed 47/48 endometriomas, ranging in size from 10 to 62 mm, detected by MRI, with only one false positive due to an hemorrhagic corpus luteum. Nevertheless, 2 intra-ovarian endometriomas were detected by laparoscopy only thanks MRI guidance. Implants were discovered in 17/30 patients with MRI, laparoscopically in 18/30. MRI detected 46 endometrial implants out of 57 detected by laparoscopy (80.7%): 17/46 implants were directly confirmed by laparoscopy, 29/46 were indirectly confirmed by the presence of adhesions. As regards staging, there was agreement between the MRI and AFS classification in 33/35 patients with only two case of discordance (K= 0,892).
Although MRI has limitations such as suboptimal depiction of small implants and adhesions, this technique is very useful for guiding laparoscopy. Moreover, the high level of agreement (96.6%) between the MRI staging proposed in this paper and laparoscopic classification demonstrates a further advantage of the use of MRI in the preoperative staging of endometriosis.
介绍一种基于磁共振成像(MRI)特征的盆腔子宫内膜异位症分期方法,并与美国生育协会(AFS)腹腔镜分类法进行比较。
35例临床怀疑患有子宫内膜异位症的女性连续接受了MRI检查,采用快速自旋回波T1、T2加权成像以及自旋回波脂肪抑制T1加权成像序列,以显示子宫内膜瘤和盆腔植入物的存在。在检查后的两周内(平均8天)进行了腹腔镜检查。一位在盆腔病理学方面经验丰富的放射科医生评估了子宫内膜瘤和植入物的存在情况,并计算出一个分数,将子宫内膜异位症分为四类,与AFS腹腔镜分期相当。MRI分数基于子宫内膜瘤在T2加权图像上的大小、边缘、壁厚、分隔、信号强度以及盆腔植入物的存在情况。使用k统计量评估MRI与腹腔镜分类之间的一致性。
腹腔镜检查证实了MRI检测到的47/48个子宫内膜瘤,大小从10到62毫米不等,仅有一个因黄体出血导致的假阳性。然而,仅通过MRI引导,腹腔镜检查发现了2个卵巢内子宫内膜瘤。在30例患者中,MRI检测到17例有植入物,腹腔镜检查发现18例。MRI在腹腔镜检查发现的57个子宫内膜植入物中检测到46个(80.7%):46个植入物中有17个通过腹腔镜直接证实,29个通过粘连的存在间接证实。关于分期,35例患者中有33例MRI与AFS分类一致,仅有2例不一致(K = 0.892)。
尽管MRI存在局限性,如对小植入物和粘连的显示欠佳,但该技术对指导腹腔镜检查非常有用。此外,本文提出的MRI分期与腹腔镜分类之间的高度一致性(96.6%)表明了在子宫内膜异位症术前分期中使用MRI的另一个优势。