Holzschuh Jochen, Hauptmann Giselbert, Driever Wolfgang
Developmental Biology, Institute Biology 1, University of Freiburg, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany.
J Neurosci. 2003 Jul 2;23(13):5507-19. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-13-05507.2003.
CNS catecholaminergic neurons can be distinguished by their neurotransmitters as dopaminergic or noradrenergic and form in distinct regions at characteristic embryonic stages. This raises the question of whether all catecholaminergic neurons of one transmitter type are specified by the same set of factors. Therefore, we performed genetic analyses to define signaling requirements for the specification of distinct clusters of catecholaminergic neurons in zebrafish. In mutants affecting midbrain- hindbrain boundary (MHB) organizer formation, the earliest ventral diencephalic dopaminergic neurons appear normal. However, after 2 d of development, we observed fewer cells than in wild types, which suggests that the MHB provides proliferation or survival factors rather than specifying ventral diencephalic dopaminergic clusters. In hedgehog (Hh) pathway mutants, the formation of catecholaminergic neurons is affected only in the pretectal cluster. Surprisingly, neither fibroblast growth factor 8 (FGF8) alone nor in combination with Hh signaling is required for specification of early developing dopaminergic neurons. We analyzed the formation of prosomeric territories in the forebrain of Hh and Nodal pathway mutants to determine whether the absence of specific dopaminergic clusters may be caused by early patterning defects ablating corresponding parts of the CNS. In Nodal pathway mutants, ventral diencephalic and pretectal catecholaminergic neurons fail to develop, whereas both anatomical structures form at least in part. This suggests that Nodal signaling is required for catecholaminergic neuron specification. In summary, our results do not support the previously suggested dominant roles for sonic hedgehog and Fgf8 in specification of the first catecholaminergic neurons, but instead indicate a novel role for Nodal signaling in this process.
中枢神经系统(CNS)中的儿茶酚胺能神经元可根据其神经递质分为多巴胺能或去甲肾上腺素能神经元,并在特定的胚胎阶段于不同区域形成。这就提出了一个问题,即同一递质类型的所有儿茶酚胺能神经元是否由同一组因子所特化。因此,我们进行了遗传学分析,以确定斑马鱼中不同儿茶酚胺能神经元簇特化所需的信号传导条件。在影响中脑 - 后脑边界(MHB)组织者形成的突变体中,最早的腹侧间脑多巴胺能神经元看起来正常。然而,在发育2天后,我们观察到这些神经元的数量比野生型少,这表明MHB提供的是增殖或存活因子,而非特化腹侧间脑多巴胺能神经元簇。在刺猬信号通路(Hh)突变体中,儿茶酚胺能神经元的形成仅在前顶盖簇中受到影响。令人惊讶的是,早期发育的多巴胺能神经元的特化既不需要单独的成纤维细胞生长因子8(FGF8),也不需要它与Hh信号通路共同作用。我们分析了Hh和Nodal信号通路突变体前脑中前脑节段区域的形成情况,以确定特定多巴胺能簇的缺失是否可能是由于早期模式缺陷导致中枢神经系统相应部分被消融所致。在Nodal信号通路突变体中,腹侧间脑和前顶盖儿茶酚胺能神经元无法发育,而这两个解剖结构至少部分形成。这表明Nodal信号传导对于儿茶酚胺能神经元的特化是必需的。总之,我们的结果不支持先前提出的音猬因子(sonic hedgehog)和Fgf8在首批儿茶酚胺能神经元特化中起主导作用的观点,而是表明Nodal信号传导在此过程中具有新的作用。