Chee Gerard H, Nedzelski Julian M, Rowed David
Department of Otolaryngology and dagger Department of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Otol Neurotol. 2003 Jul;24(4):672-6. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200307000-00023.
To report the long-term outcome hearing results following acoustic neuroma surgery. To determine whether changes, if any, in the thresholds of the operated ear are mirrored in the contralateral unoperated side. In addition, to identify predictive factors, if any, that may predispose individuals to hearing loss in the operated ear in the late post-operative period.
Retrospective patient chart review.
University Tertiary Referral Centre.
From 1978 to 1997, one hundred and twenty six patients with small acoustic neuromas (less than 2 cm as measured within in the cerebellopontine angle) underwent excision via the suboccipital (retrosigmoid) approach with the patient in the prone position. Hearing preservation was successful in 43 patients (34.1%). The audiometric data of thirty patients with a minimum follow-up interval of 36 months was analyzed. The mean follow-up period was 113.4 months (range 36-264, SD=57.8) and the mean age at surgery was 47.3 years (range 32 to 64, SD = 7.3).
Speech Reception Thresholds (SRT), Speech Discrimination Scores (SDS) and Pure-tone Audiometry (PTA, 0.5, 1 & 2 kHz) were noted on the operated and unoperated ears. The AAO Classification according to the Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma was used to assess hearing serviceability.
Subsequent to including corresponding changes in the unoperated ear, the means of the SRT and PTA in the operated ear between the early and late post-operative periods were statistically significantly different (p=0.0012 & 0.034 respectively). Twelve (40%) patients demonstrated significant deterioration in hearing thresholds over time. Pre-operatively, 96.7% of patients had serviceable hearing (Class A & B). This falls to 76.6% in the early post-operative period and to 56.7% in the late post-operative period.
Our study highlights the finding that over time a significant number of individuals realize a greater ongoing hearing loss in the post tumour excision ear than the contralateral ear.
报告听神经瘤手术后听力的长期结果。确定患侧耳阈值的任何变化是否会反映在对侧未手术的耳朵中。此外,识别术后晚期可能使个体易患患侧耳听力损失的预测因素(如有)。
回顾性患者病历审查。
大学三级转诊中心。
1978年至1997年,126例小听神经瘤(桥小脑角内测量小于2厘米)患者采用枕下(乙状窦后)入路在俯卧位下行切除术。43例患者(34.1%)听力保留成功。分析了30例随访间隔至少36个月患者的听力测定数据。平均随访期为113.4个月(范围36 - 264个月,标准差 = 57.8),手术时的平均年龄为47.3岁(范围32至64岁,标准差 = 7.3)。
记录患侧耳和未患侧耳的言语接受阈值(SRT)、言语辨别得分(SDS)和纯音听力测定(PTA,0.5、1和2千赫兹)。根据听力学与平衡委员会关于听神经瘤听力保留评估指南的美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会(AAO)分类用于评估听力可用性。
纳入未手术耳的相应变化后,患侧耳术后早期和晚期之间SRT和PTA的平均值在统计学上有显著差异(分别为p = 0.0012和0.034)。12例(40%)患者的听力阈值随时间出现显著恶化。术前,96.7%的患者听力可用(A类和B类)。术后早期降至76.6%,术后晚期降至56.7%。
我们的研究突出了这样一个发现,即随着时间的推移,大量个体在肿瘤切除耳中出现的听力损失比在对侧耳中更大。