Prokopy Ronald J, Chandler Bradley W, Dynok Sara A, Piñero Jaime C
Department of Entomology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
J Econ Entomol. 2003 Jun;96(3):826-34. doi: 10.1093/jee/96.3.826.
We compared a trap approach with a trap-tree approach to determine the need and timing of insecticide applications against overwintered adult plum curculios, Conotrachelus nenuphar (Herbst.), in commercial apple orchards in Massachusetts in 2002. All traps and trap trees were baited with benzaldehyde (attractive fruit odor) plus grandisoic acid (attractive pheromone). Sticky clear Plexiglas panel traps placed at orchard borders, designed to intercept adults immigrating from border areas by flight, captured significantly more adults than similarly placed black pyramid traps, which are designed to capture adults immigrating primarily by crawling, or Circle traps wrapped around trunks of perimeter-row trees, which are designed to intercept adults crawling up tree trunks. None of these trap types, however, exhibited amounts of captures that correlated significantly with either weekly or season-long amounts of fresh ovipositional injury to fruit by adults. Hence, none appears to offer high promise as a tool for effectively monitoring the seasonal course of plum curculio injury to apples in commercial orchards in Massachusetts. In contrast, baiting branches of selected perimeter-row trees with benzaldehyde plus grandisoic acid led to significant aggregation (14-15-fold) of ovipositional injury, markedly facilitating monitoring of the seasonal course of injury to apples. A concurrent experiment revealed that addition of other synthetic fruit odor attractants to apple trees baited with benzaldehyde plus grandisoic acid did not enhance aggregation of ovipositional injury above that of this dual combination. We conclude that monitoring apples on odor-baited trap trees for fresh ovipositional injury could be a useful new approach for determining need and timing of insecticide application against plum curculio in commercial orchards.
2002年,我们在马萨诸塞州的商业苹果园中比较了诱捕法和诱捕树法,以确定针对越冬的成年李象甲(Conotrachelus nenuphar (Herbst.))施用杀虫剂的必要性和时机。所有诱捕器和诱捕树均用苯甲醛(有吸引力的水果气味)加格氏酸(有吸引力的信息素)进行诱饵处理。放置在果园边界的透明粘性有机玻璃板诱捕器,旨在拦截通过飞行从边界区域迁入的成虫,捕获的成虫数量明显多于同样放置的黑色金字塔形诱捕器,后者主要用于捕获通过爬行迁入的成虫,以及环绕周边行树木树干的圆形诱捕器,其旨在拦截爬上树干的成虫。然而,这些诱捕器类型中,没有一种捕获量与成虫每周或整个季节对果实造成的新鲜产卵损伤量有显著相关性。因此,似乎没有一种诱捕器有望成为有效监测马萨诸塞州商业果园中李象甲对苹果造成损伤的季节性过程的工具。相比之下,用苯甲醛加格氏酸对选定周边行树木的枝条进行诱饵处理,会导致产卵损伤显著聚集(14 - 15倍),明显便于监测苹果损伤的季节性过程。一项同期实验表明,在以苯甲醛加格氏酸为诱饵的苹果树上添加其他合成水果气味引诱剂,并不会使产卵损伤的聚集程度高于这种二元组合。我们得出结论,监测气味诱饵诱捕树上苹果的新鲜产卵损伤,可能是确定商业果园中针对李象甲施用杀虫剂的必要性和时机的一种有用新方法。