Suppr超能文献

布地奈德/福莫特罗个体化、可调整的维持治疗方案,以低于固定剂量的总剂量有效控制哮喘症状。

An individualized, adjustable maintenance regimen of budesonide/formoterol provides effective asthma symptom control at a lower overall dose than fixed dosing.

作者信息

Leuppi Jörg D, Salzberg Marc, Meyer L, Bucher S E, Nief M, Brutsche Martin H, Tamm Michael

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Swiss Med Wkly. 2003 May 31;133(21-22):302-9. doi: 10.4414/smw.2003.10229.

Abstract

PRINCIPLES

Current asthma management employing inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and longacting b2-agonists (LABA) aims to rapidly achieve and then maintain overall asthma control including symptoms with minimal medication. This study compared self-guided adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler with fixed dosing.

METHODS

In an open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study, 127 asthmatic patients, well controlled on ICS and LABA, were treated with budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort) Turbuhaler) 200/6 mg (equivalent to 160/4.5 mg delivered dose) 2 inhalations bid for 4 weeks, and were then randomised to budesonide/formoterol adjustable dosing (n = 69) (guided self-adjustment of dose: 1 inhalation bid or 2 inhalations at night with interim step ups to 2 inhalations bid and if not sufficient up to 4 inhalations bid for 14 days) or fixed dosing (2 inhalations bid) (n = 58) for 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Patients used adjustable dosing effectively; >50% used a decreased maintenance dose on >50% of the days. Seventy-two percent (50/69) from the adjustable-dosing group reduced their maintenance dose within the first 2 treatment weeks. Thirteen adjustable-dose patients (18.8%) never reduced their dose and 4 (5.8%) stepped up their dose. Symptom severity (NHLBI severity grade) decreased in both groups; however, the decrease was only statistically significant (p = 0.004) in the adjustable-dosing group. Treatment failures occurred in 17% and 24% of patients (adjustable and fixed dosing, respectively p = 0.35). Nocturnal awakenings (0.057 vs. 0.067/night, p = 0.006) and rescue medication use (0.15 vs. 0.23 inhalations/day, p <0.0001) were significantly less frequent with adjustable dosing, and the average daily medication dose was significantly reduced (3.0 vs. 3.9, p <0.0001) compared with fixed dosing. Lung function measurements (FEV1 and PEF) were not significantly different between groups during the study. There were no asthma-related hospital admissions.

CONCLUSION

Asthma patients on adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/ formoterol maintained control of symptoms using significantly less medication overall than fixed dosing. Thus, adjustable maintenance dosing achieved guideline goals of effective asthma control at an appropriately low maintenance dose. However, larger studies on adjustable maintenance dosing are needed.

摘要

原则

目前使用吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)和长效β2受体激动剂(LABA)的哮喘管理旨在迅速实现并随后维持全面的哮喘控制,包括以最少的药物控制症状。本研究比较了布地奈德/福莫特罗单吸入器中自我指导的可调节维持剂量与固定剂量。

方法

在一项开放标签、平行组、多中心研究中,127名在ICS和LABA治疗下病情得到良好控制的哮喘患者,接受布地奈德/福莫特罗(信必可都保)200/6毫克(相当于160/4.5毫克递送剂量),每日两次,每次2吸,持续4周,然后随机分为布地奈德/福莫特罗可调节剂量组(n = 69)(剂量的自我指导调整:每日两次,每次1吸或晚上2吸,中间可逐步增加至每日两次,每次2吸,如果剂量不足,可增加至每日两次,每次4吸,持续14天)或固定剂量组(每日两次,每次2吸)(n = 58),持续12周。

结果

患者有效地使用了可调节剂量;超过50%的患者在超过50%的天数里使用了减少的维持剂量。可调节剂量组中有72%(50/69)的患者在治疗的前两周内减少了维持剂量。13名可调节剂量患者(18.8%)从未减少剂量,4名(5.8%)增加了剂量。两组患者的症状严重程度(美国国立卫生研究院心肺血液研究所严重程度分级)均有所下降;然而,仅在可调节剂量组中,下降具有统计学意义(p = 0.004)。治疗失败分别发生在17%和24%的患者中(可调节剂量组和固定剂量组,p = 0.35)。可调节剂量组夜间觉醒次数(每晚0.057次对0.067次,p = 0.006)和急救药物使用次数(每天0.15次对0.23次,p <0.0001)明显减少,与固定剂量组相比,平均每日药物剂量显著降低(3.0对3.9,p <0.0001)。在研究期间,两组之间的肺功能测量值(FEV1和PEF)没有显著差异。没有与哮喘相关的住院治疗。

结论

使用布地奈德/福莫特罗进行可调节维持剂量治疗的哮喘患者总体上使用的药物明显少于固定剂量,从而维持了症状控制。因此,可调节维持剂量以适当低的维持剂量实现了有效哮喘控制的指南目标。然而,需要对可调节维持剂量进行更大规模的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验