Stewart Jonathan, Kellett Norma, Castro Dan
*Inveresk Research, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; and †Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois.
Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):412-416. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000069506.68137.F2.
We compared the central nervous system (CNS) and cardiovascular effects of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine when given IV to healthy male volunteers (n = 14) in a double-blinded, randomized, crossover trial. Subjects received levobupivacaine 0.5% or ropivacaine 0.5% after a test infusion with lidocaine to become familiar with the early signs of CNS effects (e.g., tinnitus, circumoral paresthesia, hypesthesia). The development of CNS symptoms was assessed at 1-min intervals and study drug administration was terminated when the first CNS symptoms were recognized. Thereafter, symptoms were recorded at 1-min intervals until symptom resolution. Hemodynamic variables were assessed by transthoracic electrical bioimpedance. Continuous 12-lead electrocardiogram monitoring was also performed. There was no significant difference between levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for: the mean time to the first onset of CNS symptoms (P = 0.870), mean total volume of study drug administered at the onset of the first CNS symptom (P = 0.595), stroke index (P = 0.678), cardiac index (P = 0.488), acceleration index (P = 0.697), PR interval (P = 0.213), QRS duration (P = 0.637), QT interval (P = 0.724), QTc interval (P = 0.737), and heart rate (P = 0.267). Overall, fewer CNS symptoms were reported for levobupivacaine than ropivacaine (218 versus 277). This study found that levobupivacaine and ropivacaine produce similar CNS and cardiovascular effects when infused IV at equal concentrations, milligram doses, and infusion rates.
This study compared directly, for the first time, the toxicity of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in healthy volunteers. Levobupivacaine and ropivacaine produced similar central nervous system and cardiovascular effects when infused IV at equal concentrations, milligram doses, and infusion rates.
在一项双盲、随机、交叉试验中,我们比较了左旋布比卡因和罗哌卡因静脉注射给健康男性志愿者(n = 14)时对中枢神经系统(CNS)和心血管系统的影响。在给予利多卡因进行试验性输注以使受试者熟悉中枢神经系统效应的早期体征(如耳鸣、口周感觉异常、感觉减退)后,受试者接受0.5%左旋布比卡因或0.5%罗哌卡因。每隔1分钟评估中枢神经系统症状的发生情况,当识别出首个中枢神经系统症状时终止研究药物给药。此后,每隔1分钟记录症状,直至症状缓解。通过经胸电阻抗评估血流动力学变量。还进行了连续12导联心电图监测。左旋布比卡因和罗哌卡因在以下方面无显著差异:首个中枢神经系统症状出现的平均时间(P = 0.870)、首个中枢神经系统症状出现时给予的研究药物平均总体积(P = 0.595)、每搏指数(P = 0.678)、心脏指数(P = 0.488)、加速度指数(P = 0.697)、PR间期(P = 0.213)、QRS时限(P = 0.637)、QT间期(P = 0.724)、QTc间期(P = 0.737)和心率(P = 0.267)。总体而言,报告的左旋布比卡因中枢神经系统症状少于罗哌卡因(218例对277例)。本研究发现,当以相等浓度、毫克剂量和输注速率静脉输注时,左旋布比卡因和罗哌卡因产生相似的中枢神经系统和心血管系统效应。
本研究首次直接比较了左旋布比卡因和罗哌卡因在健康志愿者中的毒性。当以相等浓度、毫克剂量和输注速率静脉输注时,左旋布比卡因和罗哌卡因产生相似的中枢神经系统和心血管系统效应。