Tate Jillian R, Gill Devinder, Cobcroft Ralph, Hickman Peter E
Chemical Pathology Department, Queensland Health Pathology Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia.
Clin Chem. 2003 Aug;49(8):1252-7. doi: 10.1373/49.8.1252.
A new immunoassay for free light chain measurements has been reported to be useful for the diagnosis and monitoring of monoclonal light chain diseases and nonsecretory myeloma. We describe experience with and some potential pitfalls of the assay.
The assay was assessed for precision, sample type and stability, recovery, and harmonization of results between two analyzers on which the reagents are used. Free-light-chain concentrations were measured in healthy individuals (to determine biological variation), patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, myeloma patients after autologous stem cell transplants, and patients with renal disease.
Analytical imprecision (CV) was 6-11% for kappa and lambda free-light-chain measurement and 16% for the calculated kappa/lambda ratio. Biological variation was generally insignificant compared with analytical variation. Despite the same reagent source, values were not completely harmonized between assay systems and may produce discordant free-light-chain ratios. In some patients with clinically stable myeloma, or post transplantation, or with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, free-light-chain concentration and ratio were within the population reference interval despite the presence of monoclonal intact immunoglobulin in serum. In other patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, values were abnormal although there was no clinical evidence of progression to multiple myeloma.
The use of free-light-chain measurements alone cannot differentiate some groups of patients with monoclonal gammopathy from healthy individuals. As with the introduction of any new test, it is essential that more scientific data about use of this assay in different subject groups are available so that results can be interpreted with clinical certainty.
据报道,一种用于检测游离轻链的新型免疫测定法对单克隆轻链疾病和非分泌性骨髓瘤的诊断及监测有用。我们描述了该测定法的应用经验及一些潜在问题。
评估了该测定法的精密度、样本类型及稳定性、回收率,以及使用该试剂的两种分析仪之间结果的一致性。测定了健康个体(以确定生物学变异)、意义未明的单克隆丙种球蛋白病患者、自体干细胞移植后的骨髓瘤患者及肾病患者的游离轻链浓度。
κ和λ游离轻链测定的分析不精密度(CV)为6% - 11%,计算的κ/λ比值的不精密度为16%。与分析变异相比,生物学变异通常不显著。尽管试剂来源相同,但各测定系统间的值并未完全一致,可能会产生不一致的游离轻链比值。在一些临床病情稳定的骨髓瘤患者、移植后患者或意义未明的单克隆丙种球蛋白病患者中,尽管血清中存在单克隆完整免疫球蛋白,但游离轻链浓度和比值仍在人群参考区间内。在其他意义未明的单克隆丙种球蛋白病患者中,尽管没有进展为多发性骨髓瘤的临床证据,但检测值异常。
仅使用游离轻链检测无法区分某些单克隆丙种球蛋白病患者与健康个体。与引入任何新检测方法一样,必须有更多关于该测定法在不同受试者群体中应用的科学数据,以便能临床确定地解释结果。