Suppr超能文献

急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)和淋巴瘤患者中抗天冬酰胺酶抗体免疫交叉反应的评估。

Evaluation of immunologic crossreaction of antiasparaginase antibodies in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoma patients.

作者信息

Wang B, Relling M V, Storm M C, Woo M H, Ribeiro R, Pui C-H, Hak L J

机构信息

Department of Hematology and Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105-2794, USA.

出版信息

Leukemia. 2003 Aug;17(8):1583-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403011.

Abstract

To evaluate how well antibodies to one asparaginase preparation predict or correlate with antibodies to another preparation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoma patients who did and did not have hypersensitivity reactions during chemotherapy. In all, 24 children with newly diagnosed ALL or lymphoma, who received Escherichia coli asparaginase 10 000 IU/m(2) IM thrice weekly for nine doses as part of multiagent induction and reinduction chemotherapy, and seven monthly doses during the first 7 months of continuation treatment, were studied. Plasma samples were collected at postinduction and at postreinduction. Six of 24 patients had no overt clinical reactions (nonreacting) and received only the E. coli preparation. Of these, 18 patients who had allergic reactions were switched to Erwinia asparaginase. A total of 18 patients had an anaphylactoid reaction to Erwinia asparaginase and were switched to receive polyethylene glycol (PEG) asparaginase. Antibody levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assay against all the three asparaginase preparations. At postinduction, antibodies against E. coli were higher in reacting patients (0.063+/-0.066) than in nonreacting patients (0.019+/-0.013) (P=0.03). At postreinduction, anti-Erwinia antibodies were significantly higher in reacting patients (0.431+/-0.727) than in nonreacting patients (0.018+/-0.009) (P=0.007). Anti-E. coli antibodies correlated with anti-PEG antibodies at postinduction (r=0.714, P<0.001) and at postreinduction (r=0.914, P<0.001), but did not correlate with anti-Erwinia antibodies at postinduction (r=0.119, P=0.580) and at postreinduction (r=0.078, P=0.716). The results indicate a crossreactivity between patient antibodies raised against natural E. coli and PEG asparaginase but not Erwinia asparaginase.

摘要

评估在接受化疗期间有或没有过敏反应的急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)和淋巴瘤患者中,针对一种天冬酰胺酶制剂的抗体对另一种制剂的预测能力或相关性如何。总共研究了24例新诊断的ALL或淋巴瘤患儿,他们接受大肠杆菌天冬酰胺酶10000 IU/m²,每周三次肌肉注射,共九剂,作为多药诱导和再诱导化疗的一部分,并在维持治疗的前7个月每月注射七剂。在诱导后和再诱导后采集血浆样本。24例患者中有6例无明显临床反应(无反应者),仅接受大肠杆菌制剂。其中,18例有过敏反应的患者改用欧文氏菌天冬酰胺酶。共有18例患者对欧文氏菌天冬酰胺酶发生类过敏反应,转而接受聚乙二醇(PEG)天冬酰胺酶治疗。通过酶联免疫吸附测定法测量针对所有三种天冬酰胺酶制剂的抗体水平。诱导后,有反应的患者中针对大肠杆菌的抗体(0.063±0.066)高于无反应的患者(0.019±0.013)(P = 0.03)。再诱导后,有反应的患者中抗欧文氏菌抗体(0.431±0.727)显著高于无反应的患者(0.018±0.009)(P = 0.007)。诱导后抗大肠杆菌抗体与抗PEG抗体相关(r = 0.714,P < = 0.001),再诱导后也相关(r = 0.914,P < = 0.001),但诱导后与抗欧文氏菌抗体不相关(r = 0.119,P = 0.580),再诱导后也不相关(r = 0.078,P = 0.716)。结果表明,患者针对天然大肠杆菌和PEG天冬酰胺酶产生的抗体之间存在交叉反应,但与欧文氏菌天冬酰胺酶不存在交叉反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验