Berger Hans J C, Aerts Francisca H T M, van Spaendonck Karel P M, Cools Alexander R, Teunisse Jan-Pieter
Department of Medical Psychology, Medical Centre, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003 Jun;25(4):502-11. doi: 10.1076/jcen.25.4.502.13870.
The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the possible role of two cognitive styles--weak central coherence and poor cognitive shifting--in predicting social improvement in patients with autistic disorder. Thirty patients, largely similar in age (young adults), intelligence (high-functioning) and living conditions (residential treatment in the same unit) were assessed at two separate time points with a 3-year interval between pretest and posttest. At pretest central coherence, cognitive shifting and several aspects of social functioning--symptom severity, social intelligence and social competence--were measured. At posttest social functioning was reassessed. Unlike central coherence, cognitive shifting was identified as a significant prognostic marker. This differential outcome might be an indication that patients with poor cognitive shifting and patients with weak central coherence have different prognoses with the current, highly structured treatment milieu; it is unknown whether patients with poor cognitive flexibility might benefit more from treatments specifically designed to address this problem.
这项前瞻性研究的目的是评估两种认知风格——弱中央连贯性和认知转换能力差——在预测自闭症谱系障碍患者社会功能改善方面可能发挥的作用。30名患者在年龄(青年成年人)、智力(高功能)和生活条件(在同一单元接受住院治疗)方面大致相似,在两个不同的时间点接受评估,前测和后测之间间隔3年。在前测时,测量中央连贯性、认知转换以及社会功能的几个方面——症状严重程度、社会智力和社会能力。在后测时,对社会功能进行重新评估。与中央连贯性不同,认知转换被确定为一个显著的预后指标。这种不同的结果可能表明,认知转换能力差的患者和中央连贯性弱的患者在当前高度结构化的治疗环境中有不同的预后;认知灵活性差的患者是否可能从专门针对该问题设计的治疗中获益更多尚不清楚。