Murphy Kevin R, Fitzpatrick Sherahe, Cruz-Rivera Mario, Miller Christopher J, Parasuraman Bhash
Midwest Allergy & Asthma Clinic, Midwest Children's Chest Physicians, Omaha, Nebraska.
Pediatrics. 2003 Sep;112(3 Pt 1):e212-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.3.e212.
To compare the effects of 2 nebulizable controller asthma medications on caregiver and pediatric quality of life.
In this 52-week, randomized trial, children aged 2 to 6 years with mild to moderate persistent asthma received budesonide inhalation suspension 0.5 mg (total daily dose) once or twice daily (n = 168) or cromolyn sodium nebulizer solution 20 mg 4 times daily (n = 167) for 8 weeks, with dosage adjustment thereafter at the investigators' discretion. The Pediatric Asthma Caregiver's Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLQ), Compliance/Caregiver Satisfaction Questionnaire (CCSQ), Modified Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form 50 (CHQ-PF50), and Functional Status-II(R) (FS-II[R]) Questionnaire were administered at baseline and weeks 8, 28, and 52. Global assessments of ease of asthma management and child health status were obtained from caregivers and physicians at the end of the study.
Improvements from baseline in domain-specific (activities and emotional function) and total PACQLQ scores were greater at each time point (weeks 8, 28, and 52) for caregivers of patients treated with budesonide compared with caregivers of patients receiving cromolyn sodium. Only the budesonide group met the criterion for a clinically important improvement (>or=0.5 unit change) in all PACQLQ domains by week 8, which was maintained at weeks 28 and 52. Moreover, improvements surpassed the criterion for moderate clinical importance (1.0 unit change) in all PACQLQ domains for the budesonide group, but this level of improvement was only achieved in the activities domain (at week 28) for the cromolyn sodium group. Based on the CCSQ, budesonide resulted in greater caregiver satisfaction, treatment convenience, ease of use, and compliance compared with cromolyn sodium. Thus, 90.7% of caregivers in the budesonide group were "completely or very satisfied" compared with 53.4% in the cromolyn sodium group. Over half (54.6%) of caregivers in the budesonide group rated budesonide "highly or very convenient" compared with 23% for cromolyn sodium; 77% rated budesonide "extremely or very easy" to use compared with 47% for cromolyn. Adherence with daily medication regimens was reported for 76% of children in the budesonide group compared with 57% in the cromolyn sodium group. Child health status, as indicated by mean FS-II(R) scores, showed improvements from baseline in both groups at weeks 8, 28, and 52. There was a trend for these improvements to be superior in the budesonide group. Additionally, budesonide was superior to cromolyn sodium in caregiver and physician global assessments. At the end of the study, 76% of caregivers of children receiving budesonide reported asthma management to be "a great deal easier" compared with the start of the study, and 74% rated the overall health status of their child as "much better now than 1 year ago." In contrast, only 29% and 37% of caregivers whose children received cromolyn sodium provided these respective ratings.
Budesonide inhalation suspension improved the quality of life for caregivers of children with asthma. Caregivers of children treated with budesonide had significantly fewer limitations in daily activities and emotional functioning compared with caregivers of children treated with cromolyn sodium nebulizer solution. The improvements in caregiver quality of life occurred earlier with budesonide compared with cromolyn sodium. Only caregivers in the budesonide group had a clinically important mean change from baseline in all PACQLQ domains by week 8. These benefits were maintained at week 52. Children treated with budesonide inhalation suspension and cromolyn sodium experienced improvements in health status, assessed using the FS-II(R). The greatest differences between treatments were seen in the disease-specific portion of the FS-II(R), which relates impairments in functional status to the child's illness. Caregiver and physician global assessment indicated significantly better overall child health after 1 year of treatment with budesonide, supporting an improvement in health status. Clinical trials in children 4 to 16 years of age with asthma have demonstrated greater effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids versus cromolyn sodium on several clinical measures of efficacy. Measures of asthma control in this study, reported in detail elsewhere [Leflein et al. Pediatrics 2002;109:866-872], also have shown greater improvements with budesonide therapy. Treatment with budesonide inhalation suspension resulted in a significantly lower mean rate of asthma exacerbations, significantly longer times to first asthma exacerbation, significantly longer times to first additional use of chronic asthma therapy, and significant improvements in asthma symptom scores and breakthrough medication use compared with cromolyn sodium therapy. Additionally, children receiving budesonide inhalation suspension experienced more symptom-free days and episode-free days compared with children receiving cromolyn sodium. Safety profiles were similar between the 2 treatment groups. Budesonide inhalation suspension was associated with significantly greater caregiver satisfaction, convenience, ease of use, and compliance compared with cromolyn sodium nebulizer solution. This greater caregiver satisfaction and quality of life may be related to the greater asthma control achieved in children treated with budesonide therapy compared with cromolyn sodium. In addition, the convenience of once- or twice-daily dosing with budesonide inhalation suspension, compared with 3- or 4-times-daily dosing of cromolyn sodium, may decrease caregiver burden and enhance the willingness of caregivers to adhere to treatment regimens prescribed for their young children with asthma. This effect on caregiver adherence could further improve treatment effectiveness. This is the first clinical trial comparing the effects of a nebulized corticosteroid with that of an alternative nebulized therapy on quality of life in young children with asthma and their families. Compared with nebulized cromolyn sodium, budesonide inhalation suspension not only provides better overall child health status and asthma management, but greater caregiver quality of life and greater caregiver satisfaction, convenience, ease of use, and compliance.
比较两种可雾化吸入的哮喘控制药物对照顾者及儿童生活质量的影响。
在这项为期52周的随机试验中,2至6岁轻度至中度持续性哮喘患儿接受布地奈德吸入混悬液0.5mg(每日总剂量),每日1次或2次(n = 168),或色甘酸钠雾化溶液20mg,每日4次(n = 167),持续8周,此后由研究者酌情调整剂量。在基线期以及第8、28和52周时,使用儿童哮喘照顾者生活质量问卷(PACQLQ)、依从性/照顾者满意度问卷(CCSQ)、改良儿童健康问卷家长版50(CHQ-PF50)以及功能状态-II(R)(FS-II[R])问卷进行评估。在研究结束时,从照顾者和医生处获得对哮喘管理难易程度和儿童健康状况的整体评估。
在每个时间点(第8、28和52周),与接受色甘酸钠治疗的患儿的照顾者相比,接受布地奈德治疗的患儿的照顾者在特定领域(活动和情感功能)及PACQLQ总分上从基线期的改善更大。仅布地奈德组在第8周时在所有PACQLQ领域均达到临床重要改善标准(变化≥0.5单位),并在第28周和52周时得以维持。此外,布地奈德组在所有PACQLQ领域的改善超过中度临床重要性标准(变化1.0单位),但色甘酸钠组仅在活动领域(第28周时)达到这一改善水平。基于CCSQ,与色甘酸钠相比,布地奈德使照顾者的满意度、治疗便利性、易用性和依从性更高。因此,布地奈德组90.7%的照顾者“完全满意或非常满意”,而色甘酸钠组为53.4%。布地奈德组超过半数(54.6%)的照顾者认为布地奈德“非常方便或极其方便”,而色甘酸钠组为23%;77%的照顾者认为布地奈德“极其容易或非常容易”使用,而色甘酸钠组为47%。布地奈德组76%的儿童报告坚持每日用药方案,而色甘酸钠组为57%。根据FS-II(R)平均得分显示,两组儿童的健康状况在第8、28和52周时均从基线期有所改善。布地奈德组的这些改善有更优的趋势。此外,在照顾者和医生的整体评估中,布地奈德优于色甘酸钠。在研究结束时,接受布地奈德治疗的儿童的76%的照顾者报告哮喘管理比研究开始时“容易得多”,74%的照顾者将其孩子的整体健康状况评为“比1年前好得多”。相比之下,接受色甘酸钠治疗的儿童的照顾者中分别只有29%和37%给出了这些评分。
布地奈德吸入混悬液改善了哮喘患儿照顾者的生活质量。与接受色甘酸钠雾化溶液治疗的患儿的照顾者相比,接受布地奈德治疗的患儿的照顾者在日常活动和情感功能方面的限制明显更少。与色甘酸钠相比,布地奈德使照顾者生活质量的改善出现得更早。仅布地奈德组在第8周时在所有PACQLQ领域均有从基线期起具有临床重要意义的平均变化。这些益处维持到第52周。使用FS-II(R)评估,接受布地奈德吸入混悬液和色甘酸钠治疗的儿童的健康状况均有改善。两种治疗方法之间的最大差异出现在FS-II(R)中与疾病相关的部分,这部分将功能状态损害与儿童疾病相关联。照顾者和医生的整体评估表明,布地奈德治疗1年后儿童的整体健康状况明显更好,支持了健康状况的改善。针对4至16岁哮喘儿童的临床试验已表明,在多项临床疗效指标上,吸入性糖皮质激素比色甘酸钠更有效。本研究中哮喘控制的指标(在其他地方[Leflein等人,《儿科学》2002年;109:866 - 872]有详细报道)也显示布地奈德治疗有更大改善。与色甘酸钠治疗相比,布地奈德吸入混悬液治疗导致哮喘发作的平均发生率显著更低,首次哮喘发作的时间显著更长,首次额外使用慢性哮喘治疗的时间显著更长,哮喘症状评分和急救药物使用有显著改善。此外,与接受色甘酸钠治疗的儿童相比,接受布地奈德吸入混悬液治疗的儿童无症状天数和无发作天数更多。两个治疗组的安全性概况相似。与色甘酸钠雾化溶液相比,布地奈德吸入混悬液使照顾者的满意度、便利性、易用性和依从性显著更高。这种更高的照顾者满意度和生活质量可能与布地奈德治疗的儿童比色甘酸钠治疗的儿童实现了更好的哮喘控制有关。此外,与色甘酸钠每日3或4次给药相比,布地奈德吸入混悬液每日1或2次给药的便利性可能减轻照顾者负担,并增强照顾者坚持为其哮喘幼儿规定的治疗方案的意愿。这种对照顾者依从性的影响可能进一步提高治疗效果。这是第一项比较雾化吸入糖皮质激素与另一种雾化治疗对哮喘幼儿及其家庭生活质量影响的临床试验。与雾化吸入色甘酸钠相比,布地奈德吸入混悬液不仅能提供更好的儿童整体健康状况和哮喘管理,还能提高照顾者的生活质量、满意度、便利性、易用性和依从性。