Okello D, Floyd K, Adatu F, Odeke R, Gargioni G
Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003 Sep;7(9 Suppl 1):S72-9.
Kiboga district, a rural area in Central Uganda.
To assess the cost and cost-effectiveness of community-based care for new smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients compared with conventional hospital-based care.
Costs were analysed from the perspective of health services, patients, and community volunteers in 1998 US dollars, using standard methods. Cost-effectiveness was calculated as the cost per patient successfully treated.
The cost per patient treated for new smear-positive patients was dollars 510 with the conventional hospital-based approach to care (dollars 419 for the health system and dollars 91 for patients), and dollars 289 with community-based care (dollars 227 for health services, dollars 53 for patients and dollars 9 for volunteers). Important new costs associated with community-based care included programme supervision (dollars 18 and dollars 9 per patient at central and district levels, respectively) and training (dollars 18 per patient). The cost per patient successfully treated was dollars 911 with the hospital-based strategy and dollars 391 with community-based care, reflecting both lower costs and higher effectiveness (74% vs. 56% successful treatment rate) with community-based care. Length of hospital stay fell from an average of 60 to 19 days.
There is a strong economic case for the implementation of community-based care in Uganda.
基博加区,乌干达中部的一个农村地区。
评估与传统的医院治疗相比,社区治疗新涂片阳性肺结核患者的成本和成本效益。
采用标准方法,从卫生服务、患者和社区志愿者的角度,以1998年美元分析成本。成本效益计算为每成功治疗一名患者的成本。
采用传统的医院治疗方法,新涂片阳性患者的人均治疗成本为510美元(卫生系统419美元,患者91美元),而社区治疗为289美元(卫生服务227美元,患者53美元,志愿者9美元)。与社区治疗相关的重要新增成本包括项目监督(中央和地区层面分别为每位患者18美元和9美元)和培训(每位患者18美元)。医院治疗策略下每成功治疗一名患者的成本为911美元,社区治疗为391美元,这反映出社区治疗成本更低且效果更好(成功率分别为74%和56%)。住院时间从平均60天降至19天。
在乌干达实施社区治疗有充分的经济理由。