Fountain D L
Center for Social Research and Policy Analysis, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC 27009-2194.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 1992 Fall;9(4):355-64. doi: 10.1016/0740-5472(92)90031-i.
This paper considers limitations to three often-used approaches for improving treatment quality in a drug abuse treatment program: supervisory review, internal program evaluations, and standard quality assurance. Total Quality Management (TQM) is then presented as a technique that maximizes the effectiveness of quality-improvement strategies and builds on them by establishing a more comprehensive approach to improving treatment quality. This paper recommends issues for treatment providers to consider in designing an efficacious TQM approach. Specific organizational characteristics are discussed that can either enhance or defeat TQM. The program should be goal oriented and have the broad commitment of staff and management to quality improvement. It should also have a well-defined and tailored system for monitoring, feedback, and change. Moreover, the program should delegate authority and responsibility to staff for improvements, possess organizational readiness, and contain an evaluative component that can determine whether TQM is meeting the program's needs.
监督审查、项目内部评估和标准质量保证。随后介绍了全面质量管理(TQM),它是一种通过建立更全面的提高治疗质量的方法来最大化质量改进策略有效性并在此基础上进一步发展的技术。本文提出了治疗提供者在设计有效的全面质量管理方法时应考虑的问题。讨论了可能增强或阻碍全面质量管理的具体组织特征。该项目应以目标为导向,工作人员和管理层应广泛致力于质量改进。它还应拥有一个定义明确且量身定制的监测、反馈和变革系统。此外,该项目应将改进的权力和责任下放给工作人员,具备组织准备情况,并包含一个评估组件,以确定全面质量管理是否满足项目需求。