Arregui M E, Davis C J, Arkush A M, Nagan R F
St. Vincent Hospital and Health Care Center, Indianapolis, IN 46260.
Surg Endosc. 1992 Jan-Feb;6(1):10-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00591180.
Six hundred twenty-two laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed at St. Vincent Hospital over a 14-month period. We reviewed the records of 366 of these patients who were referred to the authors. Thirty-six patients had suspected choledocholithiasis. The primary author (M.E.A.) performed 38 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCPs) on these patients for diagnosis and management. Seventeen of the 36 patients had common bile duct stones; 19 patients had negative studies. Of the 17 patients with choledocholithiasis, 15 had successful cannulation of the common bile duct, and, of these, 10 underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus endoscopic sphincterotomy and extraction of the common duct stone(s). In one high-risk elderly patient, we extracted the stone from the common duct and left the gallbladder in situ. Two patients failed endoscopic cannulation and underwent open cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration. Four additional patients, cannulated successfully, had unsuccessful endoscopic stone removal because the stones were too large or were impacted. Two of these patients underwent open cholecystectomy and common duct exploration. The two other patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and choledochoscopy through the cystic duct with the flexible choledochoscope. An electrohydraulic lithotripsy probe was then inserted through the choledochoscope to fragment the stones, and stone fragments were allowed to pass through the previously created sphincterotomy. We believe our data, supported by data in the literature, show that these alternative methods for treating choledocholithiasis are safe and effective and should be considered primary modalities for treating this condition now that laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for cholelithiasis.
在14个月的时间里,圣文森特医院共进行了622例腹腔镜胆囊切除术。我们回顾了其中366例被转诊至作者处的患者的记录。36例患者怀疑有胆总管结石。第一作者(M.E.A.)对这些患者进行了38次内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)以进行诊断和治疗。36例患者中,17例有胆总管结石;19例检查结果为阴性。在17例胆总管结石患者中,15例成功完成胆总管插管,其中10例接受了腹腔镜胆囊切除术加内镜括约肌切开术及胆总管结石取出术。在1例高危老年患者中,我们从胆总管取出结石,将胆囊留在原位。2例患者内镜插管失败,接受了开腹胆囊切除术及胆总管探查术。另外4例成功插管的患者,因结石过大或嵌顿,内镜取石失败。其中2例患者接受了开腹胆囊切除术及胆总管探查术。另外2例患者接受了腹腔镜胆囊切除术,并通过胆囊管使用可弯曲胆管镜进行胆管镜检查。然后通过胆管镜插入电液压碎石探头将结石破碎,结石碎片通过先前切开的括约肌排出。我们认为,我们的数据,以及文献中的数据支持,表明这些治疗胆总管结石的替代方法是安全有效的,鉴于腹腔镜胆囊切除术是胆结石的首选治疗方法,现在应将其视为治疗这种疾病的主要方式。