Wei Kunlin, Wertman Gary, Sternad Dagmar
Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16803, USA.
Motor Control. 2003 Apr;7(2):134-54. doi: 10.1123/mcj.7.2.134.
An asymmetric bimanual task was investigated in which participants performed a rhythmic movement with their dominant arm and initiated a second movement with their nondominant arm at a random phase of the continued oscillations. The objective was to examine whether different constraints existed between rhythmic and discrete movements and, more generally, whether rhythmic and discrete movements can be regarded as two different movement primitives. Participants performed rhythmic forearm rotations at 1 of 4 prescribed metronome periods. After a random interval, a trigger signaled to initiate either a discrete or rhythmic movement with the left forearm as fast as possible while continuing the oscillations. Analyses extracted the mutual influences that the two movements exerted on each other and contrasted discrete-rhythmic and rhythmic-rhythmic coupling. (a) The initiation of the rhythmic movement was constrained to occur in-phase with the ongoing rhythmic movement, while the discrete movement could be initiated at any arbitrary phase. (b) Reaction time of the initiated rhythmic movement scaled with the oscillation period, while the discrete movement's reaction time was invariant across periods. (c) Peak velocity of the initiated movement scaled with the oscillatory period in both tasks but more strongly in the discrete movement. (d) Synchronization of EMG bursts of both arm flexors was evident in both tasks but more strongly in the rhythmic-rhythmic combination. The results are interpreted as support for the hypothesis that discrete and rhythmic actions are two different control regimes, and coupling occurs at a higher level in the central nervous system.
研究了一项非对称双手任务,参与者用优势手臂进行有节奏的运动,并在持续振荡的随机相位用非优势手臂发起第二个运动。目的是检验有节奏运动和离散运动之间是否存在不同的约束,更普遍地说,有节奏运动和离散运动是否可被视为两种不同的运动原语。参与者在4个规定节拍器周期中的1个周期下进行有节奏的前臂旋转。经过一个随机间隔后,一个触发信号指示在继续振荡的同时尽快用左前臂发起离散或有节奏的运动。分析提取了两种运动相互施加的相互影响,并对比了离散-有节奏和有节奏-有节奏的耦合。(a) 有节奏运动的发起被限制为与正在进行的有节奏运动同相发生,而离散运动可以在任何任意相位发起。(b) 发起的有节奏运动的反应时间随振荡周期而变化,而离散运动的反应时间在各周期中不变。(c) 在两项任务中,发起运动的峰值速度均随振荡周期而变化,但在离散运动中变化更强烈。(d) 两项任务中双臂屈肌的肌电图爆发同步均很明显,但在有节奏-有节奏组合中更强烈。结果被解释为支持以下假设:离散动作和有节奏动作是两种不同的控制方式,且耦合发生在中枢神经系统的更高水平。