Lyng J, Heron I
Bacterial Vaccines Department, Statens Seruminstitut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Biologicals. 1992 Jun;20(2):101-8. doi: 10.1016/s1045-1056(05)80057-0.
Two diphtheria toxoid preparations were compared in potency assays in guinea-pigs using different methods for evaluation of the responses to vaccination. The methods used were the direct skin challenge (Schick test) and ELISA and VERO cell titration of antibodies. The different evaluation methods resulted in the same relative potencies between the toxoids. It was observed that when first-vaccination sera were compared with a second-vaccination serum, the relative antibody concentration depended on whether ELISA or VERO cell titration was used.
使用不同方法评估豚鼠对白喉类毒素疫苗接种的反应,比较了两种白喉类毒素制剂的效力。所使用的方法包括直接皮肤激发试验(锡克试验)、酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)以及抗体的VERO细胞滴定法。不同的评估方法得出两种类毒素之间具有相同的相对效力。据观察,当将首次接种血清与第二次接种血清进行比较时,相对抗体浓度取决于所使用的是ELISA法还是VERO细胞滴定法。