Suppr超能文献

乳腺钼靶摄影屏-片选择:个体机构检测技术

Mammography screen-film selection: individual facility testing technique.

作者信息

Kimme-Smith C, Bassett L, Gold R H, Parkinson B

机构信息

Iris Cantor Center for Breast Imaging, Department of Radiological Sciences, UCLA School of Medicine 90024-6916.

出版信息

Med Phys. 1992 Sep-Oct;19(5):1195-9. doi: 10.1118/1.596793.

Abstract

Variations in tube output, film processing, and radiologist's preferences affect the screen-film combination that is appropriate for any particular mammographic facility. A technique to test a variety of screen-film combinations for screening mammography is described. Films are selected for testing because of their densitometric characteristics. Dose and clinical reliability are established with phantoms before the screen-film combinations are used to image consecutive patients having bilateral examinations. The mammograms selected for evaluation are those with similar optical density ranges, and which also may be compared to available previous mammograms or which have unusual mammographic findings. All radiologists reading mammograms at a facility independently score the selected cases. Scores of "unacceptable," "acceptable," or "outstanding" are assigned to four basic imaging characteristics: sharpness, contrast, visibility of skin line, and noise. Interobserver variations by this method require normalization, unlike ROC analysis which is not applicable for this data because of the absence of proved pathologic diagnoses. The testing of 5 films and two screens using 42 patient examinations required 2 h of time from each radiologist. It took 7 h of the physicist's time to pretest the 5 films, select the 42 acceptable examinations for testing by the radiologists, and summarize the data.

摘要

管输出、胶片处理以及放射科医生偏好的差异会影响适合任何特定乳腺摄影设备的增感屏 - 胶片组合。本文描述了一种用于测试多种增感屏 - 胶片组合以进行乳腺筛查的技术。根据胶片的密度测量特性选择用于测试的胶片。在使用增感屏 - 胶片组合对连续进行双侧检查的患者进行成像之前,先使用模体确定剂量和临床可靠性。选择用于评估的乳腺造影片是那些具有相似光学密度范围的片子,并且还可以与之前可得的乳腺造影片进行比较,或者具有不寻常的乳腺摄影表现。在一个机构阅读乳腺造影片的所有放射科医生独立对所选病例进行评分。针对锐度、对比度、皮肤线可见性和噪声这四个基本成像特征,分别给出“不可接受”“可接受”或“优秀”的评分。与ROC分析不同,这种方法的观察者间差异需要进行归一化处理,因为缺乏经证实的病理诊断,ROC分析不适用于此数据。使用42例患者检查对5种胶片和两种增感屏进行测试,每位放射科医生需要2小时。物理学家花费7小时对5种胶片进行预测试,选择42例可接受的检查供放射科医生测试,并汇总数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验