Hogervorst Maarten A, Glennerster Andrew, Eagle Richard A
Department of Experimental Psychology,University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
J Vis. 2003;3(7):464-85. doi: 10.1167/3.7.2. Epub 2003 Aug 19.
To gain insight into how speeds are combined in structure-from-motion, we compared performance for estimating the mean speed and performance for detecting deviations from planarity. The stimuli showed a center dot surrounded by an annulus of dots. In one (plane) condition, the stimuli simulated a rotating plane. In a two alternative forced choice (2AFC) task, the subject had to choose in which of two stimuli the center dot moved in the plane. In another (cloud) condition, the same dot locations and speeds were used but now assigned to different dots. Such a stimulus resembles a translating and rotating cloud of dots. In this case, the subject had to choose the stimulus in which the center dot moved with the mean speed of the surrounding dots. Performance was measured as a function of deformation/slant. Although location and speeds were the same in both conditions, performance was much poorer in the cloud condition. Subsequent experiments and an ideal observer model point to a plausible explanation: in detecting deviations from planarity, the visual system can focus on the most reliable pieces of information (the slower dots, closest to the test dot). Although performance could benefit by taking more dots into account, performance barely improved with an increase in the number of dots. This may reflect a limited processing capacity of the visual system.
为深入了解速度在从运动中构建结构时是如何组合的,我们比较了估计平均速度的表现和检测与平面度偏差的表现。刺激物呈现为一个中心点被一圈点包围。在一种(平面)条件下,刺激物模拟一个旋转的平面。在一个二选一强制选择(2AFC)任务中,受试者必须选择两个刺激物中中心点在平面内移动的那一个。在另一种(云状)条件下,使用相同的点位置和速度,但现在分配给不同的点。这样的刺激物类似于一个平移和旋转的点云。在这种情况下,受试者必须选择中心点以周围点的平均速度移动的刺激物。表现作为变形/倾斜的函数来测量。尽管在两种条件下位置和速度相同,但在云状条件下表现要差得多。后续实验和一个理想观察者模型指向了一个合理的解释:在检测与平面度的偏差时,视觉系统可以聚焦于最可靠的信息片段(较慢的点,最接近测试点的点)。尽管考虑更多的点可能会提高表现,但随着点数量的增加,表现几乎没有改善。这可能反映了视觉系统有限的处理能力。