Suppr超能文献

重症监护患者的心律失常

Arrhythmias in the intensive care patient.

作者信息

Trappe Hans-Joachim, Brandts Bodo, Weismueller Peter

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

Curr Opin Crit Care. 2003 Oct;9(5):345-55. doi: 10.1097/00075198-200310000-00003.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, AV-nodal reentry tachycardia with rapid ventricular response, atrial ectopic tachycardia, and preexcitation syndromes combined with atrial fibrillation or ventricular tachyarrhythmias are typical arrhythmias in intensive care patients. Most frequently, the diagnosis of the underlying arrhythmia is possible from the physical examination, the response to maneuvers or drugs, and the 12-lead surface electrocardiogram. In all patients with unstable hemodynamics, immediate DC-cardioversion is indicated. Conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm is possible using antiarrhythmic drugs. Amiodarone has a conversion rate in atrial fibrillation of up to 80%. However, caution in the use of short-term administration of intravenous amiodarone in critically ill patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation is absolutely necessary, and the duration of therapy should not exceed 24 to 48 hours. Ibutilide represents a relatively new class III antiarrhythmic agent that has been reported to have conversion rates of 50% to 70%; it seems that ibutilide is even successful when intravenous amiodarone failed to convert atrial fibrillation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Newer studies compared the outcome of patients with atrial fibrillation and rhythm- or rate-control. Data from these studies (AFFIRM, RACE) clearly showed that rhythm control is not superior to rate control for the prevention of death and morbidity from cardiovascular causes. Therefore, rate-control may be an appropriate therapy in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation after DC-cardioversion. Acute therapy of atrial flutter in intensive care patients depends on the clinical presentation. Atrial flutter can most often be successfully cardioverted to sinus rhythm with energies less than 50 joules. Ibutilide trials showed efficacy rates of 38-76% for conversion of atrial flutter to sinus rhythm compared with conversion rates of 5-13% when intravenous flecainide, propafenone, or verapamil was administered. In addition, a high dose (2 mg) of ibutilide was more effective than sotalol (1.5 mg/kg) in conversion of atrial flutter to sinus rhythm (70% versus 19%).

SUMMARY

There is general agreement that bystander first aid, defibrillation, and advanced life support is essential for neurologic outcome in patients after cardiac arrest due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The best survival rate from cardiac arrest can be achieved only when (1) recognition of early warning signs, (2) activation of the emergency medical services system, (3) basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation, (4) defibrillation, (5) management of the airway and ventilation, and (6) intravenous administration of medications occurs as rapidly as possible. Public access defibrillation, which places automatic external defibrillators in the hands of trained laypersons, seems to be an ideal approach in the treatment of ventricular fibrillation. The use of automatic external defibrillators by basic life support ambulance providers or first responder in early defibrillation programs has been associated with a significant increase in survival rates. Drugs such as lidocaine, procainamide, sotalol, amiodarone, or magnesium were recommended for treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in intensive care patients. Amiodarone is a highly efficacious antiarrhythmic agent for many cardiac arrhythmias, ranging from atrial fibrillation to malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias, and seems to be superior to other antiarrhythmic agents.

摘要

综述目的

心房颤动、心房扑动、伴有快速心室反应的房室结折返性心动过速、房性异位性心动过速以及合并心房颤动或室性快速心律失常的预激综合征是重症监护患者的典型心律失常。大多数情况下,通过体格检查、对手法或药物的反应以及12导联体表心电图可对潜在心律失常作出诊断。对于所有血流动力学不稳定的患者,均需立即进行直流电复律。使用抗心律失常药物可使心房颤动转复为窦性心律。胺碘酮使心房颤动转复的成功率高达80%。然而,对于近期发生心房颤动的重症患者,绝对有必要谨慎短期静脉使用胺碘酮,且治疗持续时间不应超过24至48小时。伊布利特是一种相对较新的III类抗心律失常药物,据报道其转复成功率为50%至70%;当静脉使用胺碘酮未能转复心房颤动时,伊布利特似乎仍能成功。

最新研究发现

最新研究比较了心房颤动患者节律控制和心率控制的结果。这些研究(AFFIRM、RACE)的数据清楚表明,在预防心血管原因导致的死亡和发病方面,节律控制并不优于心率控制。因此,对于直流电复律后复发心房颤动的患者,心率控制可能是一种合适的治疗方法。重症监护患者心房扑动的急性治疗取决于临床表现。心房扑动通常可通过能量小于50焦耳成功转复为窦性心律。伊布利特试验显示,心房扑动转复为窦性心律的有效率为38% - 76%,而静脉使用氟卡尼、普罗帕酮或维拉帕米时转复率为5% - 13%。此外,高剂量(2毫克)伊布利特在心房扑动转复为窦性心律方面比索他洛尔(1.5毫克/千克)更有效(70%对19%)。

总结

人们普遍认为,旁观者急救、除颤和高级生命支持对于室性快速心律失常导致心脏骤停患者的神经学转归至关重要。只有当(1)识别早期预警信号、(2)启动紧急医疗服务系统、(3)进行基本心肺复苏、(4)除颤、(5)管理气道和通气以及(6)尽快静脉给药时,才能实现心脏骤停后的最佳生存率。公众可获取除颤,即将自动体外除颤器交给经过培训的非专业人员,这似乎是治疗心室颤动的理想方法。基础生命支持急救人员或首批响应者在早期除颤项目中使用自动体外除颤器与生存率显著提高相关。利多卡因、普鲁卡因胺、索他洛尔、胺碘酮或镁等药物被推荐用于重症监护患者室性快速心律失常的治疗。胺碘酮是一种对多种心律失常(从心房颤动到恶性室性快速心律失常)都非常有效的抗心律失常药物,似乎优于其他抗心律失常药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验