Kirk Sara F L, Harvey Emma L, McConnon Aine, Pollard Jennie E, Greenwood Darren C, Thomas James D, Ransley Joan K
Nutrition Epidemiology Group, Nuffield Institute for Health, University of Leeds, 71-75 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9PL, UK.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2003 Oct 29;3(1):19. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-3-19.
Obesity treatment is notoriously unsuccessful and one of the barriers to successful weight loss reported by patients is a lack of social support. The Internet offers a novel and fast approach to the delivery of health information, enabling 24-hour access to help and advice. However, much of the health information available on the Internet is unregulated or not written by qualified health professionals to provide unbiased information. The proposed study aims to compare a web-based weight loss package with traditional dietary treatment of obesity in participants. The project aims to deliver high quality information to the patient and to evaluate the effectiveness of this information, both in terms of weight loss outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
This study is a randomised controlled trial of a weight loss package against usual care provided within General Practice (GP) surgeries in Leeds, UK. Participants will be recruited via posters placed in participating practices. A target recruitment figure of 220 will enable 180 people to be recruited (allowing for 22% dropout). Participants agreeing to take part in the study will be randomly allocated using minimisation to either the intervention group, receiving access to the Internet site, or the usual care group. The primary outcome of the study will be the ability of the package to promote change in BMI over 6 and 12 months compared with traditional treatment. Secondary outcomes will be the ability of the Internet package to promote change in reported lifestyle behaviours. Data will be collected on participant preferences, adherence to treatment, health care use and time off work. Difference in cost between groups in provision of the intervention and the cost of the primary outcome will also be estimated.
A positive result from this study would enhance the repertoire of treatment approaches available for the management of obesity. A negative result would be used to inform the research agenda and contribute to redefining future strategies for tackling obesity.
众所周知,肥胖治疗成效不佳,患者报告的成功减肥障碍之一是缺乏社会支持。互联网为健康信息的传播提供了一种新颖且快速的方式,能实现24小时获取帮助和建议。然而,互联网上的许多健康信息未受监管,或并非由合格的健康专业人员撰写以提供无偏见的信息。拟开展的研究旨在比较基于网络的减肥方案与肥胖参与者的传统饮食治疗。该项目旨在向患者提供高质量信息,并评估此信息在减肥效果和成本效益方面的有效性。
本研究是一项针对减肥方案与英国利兹市全科医生(GP)诊所提供的常规护理进行的随机对照试验。将通过在参与诊所张贴海报招募参与者。目标招募人数为220人,以便招募到180人(考虑到22%的退出率)。同意参与研究的参与者将使用最小化法随机分配至干预组(可访问该网站)或常规护理组。研究的主要结局将是与传统治疗相比,该方案在6个月和12个月内促进体重指数变化的能力。次要结局将是网络方案促进所报告生活方式行为变化的能力。将收集有关参与者偏好、治疗依从性、医疗保健使用情况和误工时间的数据。还将估计两组在提供干预措施方面的成本差异以及主要结局的成本。
本研究的阳性结果将增加可用于管理肥胖的治疗方法种类。阴性结果将用于为研究议程提供信息,并有助于重新定义未来应对肥胖的策略。