Suppr超能文献

在接受高呼气末正压通气的急性肺损伤和急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中实施肺复张手法的效果。

Effects of recruitment maneuvers in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome ventilated with high positive end-expiratory pressure.

作者信息

Brower Roy G, Morris Alan, MacIntyre Neil, Matthay Michael A, Hayden Douglas, Thompson Taylor, Clemmer Terry, Lanken Paul N, Schoenfeld David

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2003 Nov;31(11):2592-7. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000090001.91640.45.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuvers (RMs) may partially reverse atelectasis and reduce ventilation-associated lung injury. The purposes of this study were to assess a) magnitude and duration of RM effects on arterial oxygenation and on requirements for oxygenation support (Fio2/PEEP) in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS) receiving ventilation with low tidal volumes and high levels of PEEP; and b) frequency of adverse respiratory and circulatory events attributable to RMs.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, crossover study.

SETTING

Thirty-four intensive care units at 19 hospitals.

PATIENTS

Seventy-two patients with early ALI/ARDS. Baseline PEEP and Fio2 were 13.8 +/- 3.0 cm H2O and 0.39 +/- 0.10, respectively (mean +/- sd).

INTERVENTIONS

We conducted RMs by applying continuous positive airway pressure of 35-40 cm H2O for 30 secs. We conducted sham RMs on alternate days. We monitored oxyhemoglobin saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2), Fio2/PEEP, blood pressure, and heart rate for 8 hrs after RMs and sham RMs. We examined chest radiographs for barotrauma.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Responses to RMs were variable. Greatest increments from baseline SpO2 within 10 mins after RMs were larger than after sham RMs (1.7 +/- 0.2 vs. 0.6 +/- 0.3 %, mean +/- SEM, p < .01). Systolic blood pressure decreased more +/- 1.1 mm Hg, p < .01). Changes in Fio2/PEEP requirements were not significantly different at any time after RMs vs. sham RMs. Barotrauma was apparent on first radiographs after one RM and one sham RM.

CONCLUSIONS

In ALI/ARDS patients receiving mechanical ventilation with low tidal volumes and high PEEP, short-term effects of RMs as conducted in this study are variable. Beneficial effects on gas exchange in responders appear to be of brief duration. More information is needed to determine the role of recruitment maneuvers in the management of ALI/ARDS.

摘要

目的

呼气末正压(PEEP)和肺复张手法(RMs)可能部分逆转肺不张并减少呼吸机相关性肺损伤。本研究的目的是评估:a)在接受低潮气量和高水平PEEP通气的急性肺损伤和急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ALI/ARDS)患者中,RMs对动脉氧合及氧合支持需求(Fio2/PEEP)的影响程度和持续时间;b)归因于RMs的不良呼吸和循环事件的发生频率。

设计

前瞻性、随机、交叉研究。

地点

19家医院的34个重症监护病房。

患者

72例早期ALI/ARDS患者。基线PEEP和Fio2分别为13.8±3.0 cm H2O和0.39±0.10(均值±标准差)。

干预措施

通过施加35 - 40 cm H2O的持续气道正压30秒来进行RMs。隔天进行假RMs。在RMs和假RMs后8小时,通过脉搏血氧饱和度仪(SpO2)监测氧合血红蛋白饱和度、Fio2/PEEP、血压和心率。检查胸部X线片以观察气压伤情况。

测量指标及主要结果

对RMs的反应各不相同。RMs后10分钟内,与假RMs后相比,基线SpO2的最大增幅更大(1.7±0.2%对0.6±0.3%,均值±标准误,p <.01)。收缩压下降幅度更大(-1.1 mmHg,p <.01)。RMs与假RMs后,Fio2/PEEP需求在任何时间的变化均无显著差异。在一次RMs和一次假RMs后的第一张X线片上可见气压伤。

结论

在接受低潮气量和高PEEP机械通气的ALI/ARDS患者中,本研究中所进行的RMs的短期效果各不相同。对有反应者气体交换的有益作用似乎持续时间较短。需要更多信息来确定肺复张手法在ALI/ARDS管理中的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验