Hansen Kari Schrøder, Engesaeter Lars Birger, Viste Asgaut
Department of Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2003 Dec;4(4):285-90. doi: 10.1080/714040486.
The effectiveness of bicycle helmets in preventing head injuries is well documented. There are different opinions about the effectiveness of helmets in preventing face injuries, and few studies have analyzed the effect of different types of helmets. This study was performed to examine the effect of different helmet types to head and face injuries. The use of helmets was analyzed in cyclists with head or face injuries and compared with two control groups. The main control group was cyclists that had injuries not including the head or neck, and another control group was cyclists that had been involved in an accident, regardless of whether they had sustained any injury. Cross-table and logistic regression analyses were applied to analyze the protective effect of helmets. A total of 991 injured patients served as a basis for this study. Most of the accidents, (82%) were single accidents with no other persons involved. Of patients with injuries to the head, excluding face, 11.4% had been using hard shell helmets, and 9.6% had been using foam helmets at the time of the accident. Among the emergency room controls, the proportion of hard shell helmet users and foam helmet users was 26.4% and 11.4%, respectively. Compared to non-helmet users, this gave an odds ratio of 0.36 (CI = 0.21-0.60) for getting head injuries if the cyclists had been using hard shell helmets at the time of the injury, and 0.83 (CI = 0.41-1.67) for users of foam helmets. The odds ratio for getting face injuries was 0.90 (CI = 0.58-1.41) among users of hard shell helmets, and 1.87 (CI = 1.03-3.40) for users of foam helmets. The use of hard shell helmets reduced the risk of getting injuries to the head. Children less than nine years old that used foam helmets had an increased risk of getting face injuries. All bicyclists should be recommended to use hard shell bicycle helmets while cycling.
自行车头盔预防头部受伤的有效性已有充分记录。关于头盔预防面部受伤的有效性存在不同观点,且很少有研究分析不同类型头盔的效果。本研究旨在检验不同类型头盔对头部和面部受伤的影响。对头部或面部受伤的自行车骑行者使用头盔的情况进行了分析,并与两个对照组进行比较。主要对照组是受伤部位不包括头部或颈部的自行车骑行者,另一个对照组是曾发生事故的自行车骑行者,无论他们是否受伤。采用交叉表分析和逻辑回归分析来分析头盔的保护作用。共有991名受伤患者作为本研究的基础。大多数事故(82%)为单车事故,无其他人员卷入。在头部(不包括面部)受伤的患者中,11.4%在事故发生时使用硬壳头盔,9.6%使用泡沫头盔。在急诊室对照组中,硬壳头盔使用者和泡沫头盔使用者的比例分别为26.4%和11.4%。与未使用头盔者相比,受伤时使用硬壳头盔的自行车骑行者头部受伤的优势比为0.36(置信区间=0.21 - 0.60),使用泡沫头盔者为0.83(置信区间=0.41 - 1.67)。硬壳头盔使用者面部受伤的优势比为0.90(置信区间=0.58 - 1.41),泡沫头盔使用者为1.87(置信区间=1.03 - 3.40)。使用硬壳头盔可降低头部受伤风险。9岁以下使用泡沫头盔的儿童面部受伤风险增加。应建议所有骑自行车的人在骑车时使用硬壳自行车头盔。