Chapman S, Carter S M
School of Public Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Tob Control. 2003 Dec;12 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii13-22. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.suppl_3.iii13.
To review critically the history of Australian tobacco industry efforts to avoid, delay, and dilute pack warnings on cigarettes.
Systematic keyword and opportunistic website searches of tobacco industry internal documents made available through the Master Settlement Agreement.
Four industry strategies and six recurrent arguments used by the industry are described, which were used to thwart the passage of three generations of health warnings (implemented in 1973, 1987, and 1995). These strategies are shown to have been associated with major delays in the implementation of the warnings and in keeping them inconspicuous, unattributed to the industry and non-specific, and particularly in delaying the use of warnings about addiction. The industry today continues to oppose warnings, which might "repel" smokers from tobacco use.
Efforts by governments to introduce potent health warnings will be resisted by the tobacco industry. Tobacco control advocates should anticipate and counter the strategies and arguments used by the industry, which are described in this paper if they wish to maximise the use of the pack as a vehicle for raising awareness about the harms of smoking.
批判性地回顾澳大利亚烟草行业为避免、拖延和淡化香烟包装警示所做努力的历史。
通过《主协议和解协议》获取的烟草行业内部文件进行系统的关键词搜索和机会性网站搜索。
描述了该行业使用的四种行业策略和六个反复出现的论点,这些被用于阻碍三代健康警示(分别于1973年、1987年和1995年实施)的通过。这些策略被证明与警示实施的重大延迟以及使警示不显眼、不归于该行业且不具体相关,特别是在延迟使用关于成瘾的警示方面。如今该行业仍继续反对可能会让吸烟者“远离”烟草使用的警示。
政府引入有力健康警示的努力将遭到烟草行业的抵制。烟草控制倡导者若希望最大限度地利用包装作为提高对吸烟危害认识的工具,就应预见并反驳本文所描述的该行业使用的策略和论点。