Tsuda Naotake, Mochizuki Kazuo, Harada Mamoru, Sukehiro Aki, Kawano Koichiro, Yamada Akira, Ushijima Kimio, Sugiyama Toru, Nishida Takashi, Yamana Hideaki, Itoh Kyogo, Kamura Toshiharu
Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.
J Immunother. 2004 Jan-Feb;27(1):60-72. doi: 10.1097/00002371-200401000-00006.
Two different trials of peptide vaccination were conducted for patients with recurrent gynecologic cancers. In the first regimen, four HLA-A24+ patients (two with cervical cancer and two with ovarian cancer) were vaccinated with peptides that were predesignated before vaccination. Three patients exhibited with a grade 1 adverse effect, and no clinical response was observed in any patients. In the second regimen, six HLA-A24+ and four HLA-A2+ patients (five with cervical cancer, one with endometrial cancer, one with uterine sarcoma, and three with ovarian cancer) were vaccinated with peptides (maximum four) to which preexisting cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursors in the periphery were confirmed before vaccination. With this regimen, grade 1 adverse effects were observed in eight patients, a grade 2 adverse effect in one patient, and a grade 3 adverse effect (ie, rectal bleeding) in one patient. However, this regimen was able to enhance peptide-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in seven of ten patients, and three of five cervical cancer patients showed objective tumor regression. Analysis of immunoglobulin G -reactive to administered peptides suggested that the induction of peptide-specific immunoglobulin G was correlated with clinical responses. Overall, these results suggest that peptide vaccination of patients showing evidence of preexisting peptide-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursors could be superior to vaccination with predesignated peptides, and that the evidence-based regimen is applicable for clinical trials in treatment of patients with recurrent gynecologic cancers.
针对复发性妇科癌症患者进行了两项不同的肽疫苗接种试验。在第一种方案中,4名HLA - A24阳性患者(2名宫颈癌患者和2名卵巢癌患者)接种了接种前预先指定的肽。3名患者出现1级不良反应,未观察到任何患者有临床反应。在第二种方案中,6名HLA - A24阳性和4名HLA - A2阳性患者(5名宫颈癌患者、1名子宫内膜癌患者、1名子宫肉瘤患者和3名卵巢癌患者)接种了肽(最多4种),接种前确认外周血中存在预先存在的细胞毒性T淋巴细胞前体。采用该方案,8名患者出现1级不良反应,1名患者出现2级不良反应,1名患者出现3级不良反应(即直肠出血)。然而,该方案能够在10名患者中的7名中增强肽特异性细胞毒性T淋巴细胞,5名宫颈癌患者中的3名出现客观肿瘤消退。对与所施用肽反应的免疫球蛋白G的分析表明,肽特异性免疫球蛋白G的诱导与临床反应相关。总体而言,这些结果表明,对于显示出预先存在肽特异性细胞毒性T淋巴细胞前体证据的患者,肽疫苗接种可能优于接种预先指定的肽,并且基于证据的方案适用于复发性妇科癌症患者治疗的临床试验。