Broese van Groenou Marjolein I
Afdeling Sociaal-Culturele Wetenschappen, Faculteit der Sociale Wetenschappen, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1081c, 1081 HV Amsterdam.
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2003 Oct;34(5):196-207.
This article provides an overview of the socioeconomic inequality in physical and psychological health of older adults between 55 and 85 years of age, with a focus on the older adults whose socioeconomic status (SES) remains at a low level all their life. Data are derived from 1471 men and 1568 women, participating in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA) in 1992/1993. Based on the parental and own level of education, respondents are divided in four categories: those with a life time low level of SES, those with downward or upward mobility in SES, and those with a life time high level of SES. Logistic regression analyses showed that older adults with upward SES mobility and life time high SES, had a lower risk for functional limitations, chronic diseases (men only), 6-year mortality, depression and loneliness, compared with the older adults with life time low SES. The disadvantaged position of the low SES persons with regard to age, health and psychosocial conditions explained the SES differences in depression, but SES differences in mortality (for men) and in functional disability (for men and women) are not explained by the risk factors under study. SES differences in loneliness were attributed to differences in psychosocial conditions. Lifestyle did not add to the explanation of any of the SES differences. There were only small differences between those with a life time low SES and those with downward mobility in SES. It is concluded that a low level of education (regardless of the parental level) contributes to restricted psychosocial conditions, health problems and low well-being in old age, thereby decreasing the chances for a 'good old age' considerably.
本文概述了55至85岁老年人在生理和心理健康方面的社会经济不平等情况,重点关注那些社会经济地位(SES)一生都处于低水平的老年人。数据来自1992/1993年参与阿姆斯特丹纵向衰老研究(LASA)的1471名男性和1568名女性。根据父母和自身的教育水平,受访者被分为四类:一生SES水平低的人、SES有下降或上升变动的人以及一生SES水平高的人。逻辑回归分析表明,与一生SES水平低的老年人相比,SES有上升变动和一生SES水平高的老年人在功能受限、慢性病(仅男性)、6年死亡率、抑郁和孤独方面的风险较低。低SES人群在年龄、健康和心理社会状况方面的不利地位解释了抑郁方面的SES差异,但死亡率(男性)和功能残疾(男性和女性)方面的SES差异无法用所研究的风险因素来解释。孤独方面的SES差异归因于心理社会状况的差异。生活方式并未增加对任何SES差异的解释。一生SES水平低的人和SES有下降变动的人之间只有细微差异。研究得出结论,低教育水平(无论父母教育水平如何)会导致老年期心理社会状况受限、健康问题和幸福感低,从而大大降低了“美好老年”的机会。