Kellogg Nancy D, Menard Shirley W, Santos Annette
Departments of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78229, USA.
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 1):e67-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.1.e67.
Many clinicians expect that a history of penile-vaginal penetration will be associated with examination findings of penetrating trauma. A retrospective case review of 36 pregnant adolescent girls who presented for sexual abuse evaluations was performed to determine the presence or absence of genital findings that indicate penetrating trauma. Historical information and photograph documentation were reviewed. Only 2 of the 36 subjects had definitive findings of penetration. This study may be helpful in assisting clinicians and juries to understand that vaginal penetration generally does not result in observable evidence of healed injury to perihymenal tissues.
许多临床医生预计,阴茎-阴道插入史会与穿透性创伤的检查结果相关。对36名前来接受性虐待评估的怀孕少女进行了一项回顾性病例审查,以确定是否存在表明穿透性创伤的生殖器检查结果。审查了病史信息和照片记录。36名受试者中只有2人有明确的插入证据。这项研究可能有助于临床医生和陪审团理解,阴道插入通常不会导致处女膜周围组织愈合损伤的可观察到的证据。