Aizenstein Howard J, Stenger V Andrew, Cochran Jennifer, Clark Kristi, Johnson Melissa, Nebes Robert D, Carter Cameron S
University of Pittsburgh Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, 3811 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. azien+@pitt.edu
Cereb Cortex. 2004 Feb;14(2):199-208. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhg119.
We used event-related fMRI to identify the brain regions engaged during explicit and implicit sequence learning (ESL and ISL, respectively). Twenty-four subjects performed a concurrent ESL and ISL task. Behavior showed learning in both conditions. Prefrontal (PFC), striatal, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and visual regions (V1, V2 and V3) were engaged during both ESL and ISL. With ESL there was increased activity in the visual regions on the predictable (i.e. learned pattern) trials. With ISL, however, there was a relative decrease in activity in visual regions. The opposite patterns in the visual regions highlight the different effects of ESL and ISL. The learning process was distinguished from the result of learning, by fitting subjects' functional magnetic resonance imaging data to their learning curve. This analysis revealed more extensive PFC activity during ESL and caudal ACC activity specific for the result of learning analysis, when the expected response was violated. Our results suggest a relative dissociation of the brain regions engaged during ESL and ISL, whereby ESL and ISL can be viewed as partially distinct but overlapping parallel processes.
我们使用事件相关功能磁共振成像来识别在显性和隐性序列学习(分别为ESL和ISL)过程中参与的脑区。24名受试者同时执行ESL和ISL任务。行为表现显示在两种条件下均有学习。在ESL和ISL过程中,前额叶(PFC)、纹状体、前扣带回皮质(ACC)和视觉区域(V1、V2和V3)均被激活。在ESL过程中,可预测(即学习模式)试验时视觉区域的活动增加。然而,在ISL过程中,视觉区域的活动相对减少。视觉区域的相反模式突出了ESL和ISL的不同影响。通过将受试者的功能磁共振成像数据拟合到他们的学习曲线,将学习过程与学习结果区分开来。该分析揭示,在ESL过程中前额叶皮质活动更广泛,而在学习分析结果时,当预期反应被违反时,尾侧ACC活动具有特异性。我们的结果表明,在ESL和ISL过程中参与的脑区存在相对分离,据此ESL和ISL可被视为部分不同但重叠的并行过程。