Kuhn Louise, Stein Zena, Susser Mervyn
Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2004 Jan;18(1):10-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2003.00528.x.
Short courses of antiretroviral drugs have greatly enhanced the prospect of reducing mother-to-child HIV transmission. Yet transmission by breast feeding clouds hopes for this seemingly simple intervention. We revisit mathematical models to assess the competing risks associated with feeding by breast vs. formula. These indicate that, in the less developed world where the HIV epidemic predominates, neither option, unmodified, offers a reasonable choice for HIV-positive women. Where infant mortality rates are greater than about 40 per 1000 live births, if formula were made available to HIV-infected women only, the excess number of deaths that would result from formula use would be approximately the same or greater than the number of HIV infections that might be prevented. Only at lower infant mortality rates, less than about 40 per 1000, is the risk greater on the breast. There are thus no good grounds for the total avoidance of breast feeding under all conditions. Research to develop and test safer infant feeding alternatives is an urgent priority. On the one hand, ways to reduce HIV transmission while preserving breast feeding, as exclusive breast feeding could do, need to be fully tested. On the other hand, ways to reduce non-HIV morbidity and mortality associated with formula feeding, as educational or sanitary interventions could do, equally need testing. With either approach, a necessary foundation for implementing all the core components of preventing mother-to-child HIV transmission is competent counselling for mothers. Innovative approaches are needed to mobilise and train effective counsellors among health care workers and, as appropriate, community members.
短期抗逆转录病毒药物疗程极大地提升了降低母婴传播艾滋病毒的前景。然而,母乳喂养导致的传播给这一看似简单的干预措施蒙上了阴影。我们重新审视数学模型,以评估母乳喂养与配方奶喂养相关的竞争风险。这些模型表明,在艾滋病毒流行占主导的欠发达地区,未经调整的任何一种选择都无法为艾滋病毒呈阳性的女性提供合理的选择。在婴儿死亡率高于每1000例活产约40例的地区,如果仅向感染艾滋病毒的女性提供配方奶,因使用配方奶而导致的额外死亡人数将大致等于或超过可能预防的艾滋病毒感染人数。只有在婴儿死亡率较低(低于每1000例约40例)时,母乳喂养的风险才更大。因此,没有充分的理由在所有情况下完全避免母乳喂养。开展并测试更安全的婴儿喂养替代方法的研究是当务之急。一方面,需要充分测试在保持母乳喂养(如纯母乳喂养)的同时减少艾滋病毒传播的方法。另一方面,需要测试如教育或卫生干预措施那样减少与配方奶喂养相关的非艾滋病毒发病率和死亡率的方法。无论采用哪种方法,为母亲提供专业咨询都是实施预防母婴传播艾滋病毒所有核心组成部分的必要基础。需要创新方法来动员和培训医护人员以及在适当情况下社区成员中的有效咨询师。