Obata Takayuki, Liu Thomas T, Miller Karla L, Luh Wen Ming, Wong Eric C, Frank Lawrence R, Buxton Richard B
Department of Radiology, University of California at San Diego, 92039-0677, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Neuroimage. 2004 Jan;21(1):144-53. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.040.
The blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal measured in the brain with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during an activation experiment often exhibits pronounced transients at the beginning and end of the stimulus. Such transients could be a reflection of transients in the underlying neural activity, or they could result from transients in cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2), or cerebral blood volume (CBV). These transients were investigated using an arterial spin labeling (ASL) method that allows simultaneous measurements of BOLD and CBF responses. Responses to a finger-tapping task (40-s stimulus, 80-s rest) were measured in primary motor area (M1) and supplementary motor area (SMA) in five healthy volunteers. In SMA, the average BOLD response was pronounced near the beginning and end of the stimulus, while in M1, the BOLD response was nearly flat. However, CBF responses in the two regions were rather similar, and did not exhibit the same transient features as the BOLD response in SMA. Because this suggests a hemodynamic rather than a neural origin for the transients of the BOLD response in SMA, we used a generalization of the balloon model to test the degree of hemodynamic transients required to produce the measured curves. Both data sets could be approximated with modest differences in the shapes of the CMRO2 and CBV responses. This study illustrates the utility and the limitations of using theoretical models combined with ASL techniques to understand the dynamics of the BOLD response.
在激活实验期间,通过功能磁共振成像(fMRI)在大脑中测量的血氧水平依赖(BOLD)信号在刺激开始和结束时通常会出现明显的瞬变。这种瞬变可能是潜在神经活动瞬变的反映,也可能是脑血流量(CBF)、脑氧代谢率(CMRO2)或脑血容量(CBV)瞬变的结果。使用动脉自旋标记(ASL)方法对这些瞬变进行了研究,该方法允许同时测量BOLD和CBF反应。在五名健康志愿者的初级运动区(M1)和辅助运动区(SMA)中测量了对手指敲击任务(40秒刺激,80秒休息)的反应。在SMA中,平均BOLD反应在刺激开始和结束时附近较为明显,而在M1中,BOLD反应几乎是平坦的。然而,两个区域的CBF反应相当相似,并且没有表现出与SMA中BOLD反应相同的瞬变特征。因为这表明SMA中BOLD反应瞬变的起源是血流动力学而非神经源性的,所以我们使用了球囊模型的推广来测试产生测量曲线所需的血流动力学瞬变程度。两个数据集在CMRO2和CBV反应形状上有适度差异的情况下都可以近似。这项研究说明了使用理论模型结合ASL技术来理解BOLD反应动态的实用性和局限性。