Gordon Bruce R
Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2003 Oct;36(5):917-40. doi: 10.1016/s0030-6665(03)00059-8.
Testing for food and chemical sensitivities usually becomes necessary as part of the evaluation of otolaryngology patients who have chronic illness. The more complex the patient, and the more recalcitrant the problem is to treatment, the more likely it is that allergies, and especially food or chemical sensitivities, are involved in the pathogenesis of the illness. Failure to consider all major allergen contacts, including foods and chemicals, can lead to inadequate therapy. Similarly, failure to understand total allergic and oxidant load and the effects of chemical toxicity can lead to inappropriate or ineffective treatment. Clinically, food allergies occur in two different types: immediate, anaphylactic, fixed reactions and delayed, chronic, cyclic reactions. Different test methods have been developed for the two types. Fixed food allergies can be safely and efficiently detected by in vitro specific IgE or histamine release tests. Cyclic food allergies are best detected by either oral food challenges or by the IPDFT test. Choosing the best test for a particular patient requires a clear understanding of the two food allergy types and how their clinical presentations differ. Other tests for food allergies are compared and contrasted with these primary tests. Chemical sensitivity also occurs in two different clinical types: allergic, and toxic. True allergy to chemical haptens, either type I, IgE-mediated, or type IV, delayed hypersensitivity, occurs with significant frequency but is often unsuspected. Chemical toxicity can be caused by the aftereffects of an acute exposure or as a result of chronic, low-level exposure, but is even more frequently unsuspected and will not be diagnosed without a high index of suspicion. Both types of chemical sensitivity need to be addressed in any patients who have either a high allergen or chemical exposure load [105]. Either in vitro or in vivo tests can be used for chemical allergy detection; the advantages of each are outlined. Chemical toxicity screening tests are available and useful but do not detect all possible toxicants. Definitive toxic chemical tests usually require specialized laboratory facilities and expert consultation, for which possible sources are specified. The most important point in testing for food or chemical sensitivity is to be aware that food or chemical sensitivity can be contributing to a specific patient's clinical problems. Only then can appropriate investigations be undertaken to understand and then, perhaps, to intervene successfully in that illness.
对于患有慢性病的耳鼻喉科患者进行评估时,通常有必要检测食物和化学物质敏感性。患者情况越复杂,问题对治疗的抵抗性越强,过敏尤其是食物或化学物质敏感性就越有可能参与疾病的发病机制。若未考虑到所有主要的过敏原接触因素,包括食物和化学物质,可能导致治疗不充分。同样,若不了解总的过敏和氧化剂负荷以及化学毒性的影响,可能导致治疗不当或无效。临床上,食物过敏有两种不同类型:速发型、过敏反应性、固定性反应和迟发型、慢性、周期性反应。针对这两种类型已开发出不同的检测方法。固定性食物过敏可通过体外特异性IgE或组胺释放试验安全有效地检测出来。周期性食物过敏最好通过口服食物激发试验或IPDFT试验检测。为特定患者选择最佳检测方法需要清楚了解这两种食物过敏类型及其临床表现的差异。将其他食物过敏检测方法与这些主要检测方法进行比较和对比。化学物质敏感性也有两种不同的临床类型:过敏性和中毒性。对化学半抗原的真正过敏,无论是I型IgE介导的还是IV型迟发型超敏反应,都有相当高的发生率,但往往未被怀疑。化学毒性可能由急性暴露的后遗症引起,也可能是慢性低水平暴露的结果,但更常未被怀疑,若没有高度的怀疑指数则无法诊断。对于任何具有高过敏原或化学物质暴露负荷的患者,都需要处理这两种类型的化学物质敏感性[105]。体外或体内试验均可用于化学物质过敏检测;每种方法的优点都有概述。化学毒性筛查试验可用且有用,但不能检测出所有可能的毒物。确定性的有毒化学物质检测通常需要专门的实验室设施和专家咨询,文中指定了可能的来源。检测食物或化学物质敏感性时最重要的一点是要意识到食物或化学物质敏感性可能导致特定患者的临床问题。只有这样,才能进行适当的调查以了解情况,然后或许能够成功干预该疾病。