Giacoia G P
University of Oklahoma, College of Medicine, Tulsa.
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1992 Oct;47(10):679-87.
The growing public concern about the presence of toxic substances in the working and living environments has increased the awareness of prospective parents on the potential reproductive damage that may occur as a result of occupational exposure. The obstetrician or gynecologist attempting to counsel a couple about reproductive damage of specific occupational exposure faces a dilemma because of conflicting factors that need to be taken into account. Those factors include lack of a well-defined relationship between exposure at the worksite and reproductive damage, lack of information or conflicting data, economic concerns, and sex discrimination issues. This review describes pathogenic mechanisms of reproductive damage produced by occupational chemical exposure and details common weaknesses and problems in the interpretation and application to clinical practice of the burgeoning literature in the subject. A listing of different chemicals and physical agents suspected of producing reproductive impairment in either membrane of the reproductive dyad is presented. In addition, the legality of the so called "fetal protection policies" is also reviewed. Despite the current scientific uncertainty, knowledgeable health professionals can help parents reach an informed decision about the reproductive risks that they are willing to take when a "zero exposure" environment cannot be guaranteed and allay unfounded fears.
公众对工作和生活环境中有毒物质存在的日益关注,提高了准父母对职业暴露可能导致潜在生殖损害的认识。由于需要考虑相互冲突的因素,试图就特定职业暴露的生殖损害向夫妇提供咨询的产科医生或妇科医生面临两难境地。这些因素包括工作场所暴露与生殖损害之间缺乏明确界定的关系、信息不足或数据相互矛盾、经济问题以及性别歧视问题。本综述描述了职业化学暴露导致生殖损害的致病机制,并详细阐述了该领域新兴文献在解释和应用于临床实践中的常见弱点和问题。列出了怀疑在生殖二元体的任一环节产生生殖损害的不同化学物质和物理因素。此外,还对所谓“胎儿保护政策”的合法性进行了审查。尽管目前科学上存在不确定性,但知识渊博的健康专业人员可以帮助父母在无法保证“零暴露”环境时,就是否愿意承担生殖风险做出明智的决定,并消除无端的恐惧。