Yap Adrian U J, Saw T Y, Cao T, Ng Mary M L
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Oper Dent. 2004 Jan-Feb;29(1):92-9.
This study compared the cure and pulp-cell cytotoxicity of composites polymerized with light-emitting diode (LED) and halogen-based light curing units. A mini-filled resin composite (Tetric Ceram, Vivadent), two LED (E-light [EL], GC and Freelight [FL], 3M-ESPE), a conventional halogen (Max [MX], Dentsply) and a high-intensity halogen light (Astralis 10 [AS], Vivadent) were evaluated. Cure associated with the different lights was determined by measuring the top and bottom surface hardness (KHN; n = 5) of 2-mm thick specimens using a digital microhardness tester (load = 500 gf; dwell time = 15 seconds). Pulp-cell cytotoxicity was assessed using a direct contact method involving incisor tooth slices dissected from 28-day old Wistar rats maintained in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) and 1% agarose. The bottom surfaces of the cured composite specimens (7-mm diameter and 2-mm deep) were placed in contact with the openings of each tooth slice. After incubation in 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 degrees C for 48 hours, the tooth slices were fixed, demineralized and processed for histological examination. Pulp fibroblasts and odontoblasts were counted histomorphometrically at 400x magnification within a 1500 microm2 area using a computerized micro-imaging system. Eighteen readings were obtained for each curing light. Data was subjected to ANOVA/Scheffe's test and Pearson's correlation at significance level 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. At the top surfaces, the cure with AS was significantly greater than the other curing lights, with MX and FL being significantly greater than EL. At the bottom surfaces, MX, AS and FL had significantly better cure than EL. Specimens cured with MX were less cytotoxic than those polymerized with other curing lights. Specimens cured with AS and EL were significantly less cytotoxic than FL. Composite cure and cytotoxicity associated with LED lights is device dependent. Composite cure was not correlated to pulp-cell cytotoxicity. The response of pulpal fibroblasts to unreacted/leached components of composites differs somewhat from odontoblasts.
本研究比较了用发光二极管(LED)和卤素灯固化机聚合的复合材料的固化情况及对牙髓细胞的细胞毒性。评估了一种微填料树脂复合材料(Tetric Ceram,Vivadent)、两种LED灯(E-light [EL],GC和Freelight [FL],3M-ESPE)、一种传统卤素灯(Max [MX],登士柏)和一种高强度卤素灯(Astralis 10 [AS],Vivadent)。通过使用数字显微硬度计(载荷 = 500 gf;保压时间 = 15秒)测量2毫米厚试样的顶面和底面硬度(努氏硬度;n = 5)来确定与不同光源相关的固化情况。使用直接接触法评估牙髓细胞毒性,该方法涉及从饲养在杜氏改良伊格尔培养基(DMEM)和1%琼脂糖中的28日龄Wistar大鼠切取的切牙切片。将固化复合材料试样(直径7毫米,深2毫米)的底面与每个牙切片的开口接触。在37℃、5%二氧化碳气氛中孵育48小时后,将牙切片固定、脱矿并进行组织学检查。使用计算机化显微成像系统在400倍放大倍数下,在1500平方微米的区域内对牙髓成纤维细胞和成牙本质细胞进行组织形态计量学计数。每种固化光源获得18次读数。数据分别进行方差分析/谢费检验和皮尔逊相关性分析,显著性水平分别为0.05和0.01。在顶面,AS固化效果显著优于其他固化光源,MX和FL显著优于EL。在底面,MX、AS和FL的固化效果明显优于EL。用MX固化的试样细胞毒性低于用其他固化光源聚合的试样。用AS和EL固化的试样细胞毒性显著低于FL。与LED灯相关的复合材料固化和细胞毒性取决于设备。复合材料固化与牙髓细胞毒性无关。牙髓成纤维细胞对复合材料未反应/渗出成分的反应与成牙本质细胞略有不同。