Liu Y, Jansen G B, Lin C Y
CGIL, Department of Animal & Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1.
J Dairy Sci. 2004 Feb;87(2):491-500. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73188-4.
A maximum likelihood method was developed for QTL mapping in half-sib designs and compared to the regression method in analyses of both field and simulated data. The field data consisted of milk production evaluations of 433 progeny tested sons of 6 sires and 64 microsatellite markers distributed over 12 chromosomes. Based on permutation tests, 5 significant QTL were detected in the field data by the regression method compared with 10 by the maximum likelihood method (P < 0.05). In field data analysis, the maximum likelihood method detected more significant QTL and had a smaller residual variance than the regression method. The simulation included 9 scenarios differing in number of families, family size, QTL variance, and marker density, each replicated 100 times. The simulation results suggested that, as for the regression method, the precision of estimating QTL from the maximum likelihood method improves with increasing number of sons per sire, increasing the ratio of QTL to phenotypic variance, and decreasing marker interval. The maximum likelihood method had a smaller dispersion of estimated QTL positions than the regression method in 6 of 9 scenarios simulated. Overall, the maximum likelihood method shows potential advantage in QTL detection over the regression method, especially in the situations with less favorable conditions for QTL detection.
开发了一种用于半同胞设计中QTL定位的最大似然法,并在田间和模拟数据分析中将其与回归法进行比较。田间数据包括对6头公牛的433头经后代测试的儿子的产奶量评估以及分布在12条染色体上的64个微卫星标记。基于排列检验,回归法在田间数据中检测到5个显著的QTL,而最大似然法检测到10个(P<0.05)。在田间数据分析中,最大似然法比回归法检测到更多显著的QTL,且残差方差更小。模拟包括9种在家族数量、家族大小、QTL方差和标记密度方面不同的情况,每种情况重复100次。模拟结果表明,与回归法一样,最大似然法估计QTL的精度随着每头公牛儿子数量的增加、QTL与表型方差比值的增加以及标记间隔的减小而提高。在模拟的9种情况中的6种情况下,最大似然法估计的QTL位置的离散度比回归法小。总体而言,最大似然法在QTL检测方面比回归法显示出潜在优势,尤其是在QTL检测条件不太有利的情况下。