Matte Catherine C, Cormier James, Anderson Britt E, Athanasiadis Ioanna, Liu Jinli, Emerson Stephen G, Pear Warren, Shlomchik Warren D
Yale University School of Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, PO Box 208032, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Blood. 2004 Jun 1;103(11):4353-61. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-10-3735. Epub 2004 Feb 24.
The graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect, mediated by donor T cells, has revolutionized the treatment of leukemia. However, effective GVL remains difficult to separate from graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and many neoplasms are GVL resistant. Murine studies aimed at solving these problems have been limited by the use of leukemia cell lines with limited homology to human leukemias and by the absence of loss-of-function leukemia variants. To address these concerns, we developed a GVL model against murine chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia (mCP-CML) induced with retrovirus expressing the bcr-abl fusion cDNA, the defining genetic abnormality of chronic-phase CML (CP-CML). By generating mCP-CML in gene-deficient mice, we have studied GVL T-cell effector mechanisms. mCP-CML expression of Fas or tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptors is not required for CD8-mediated GVL. Strikingly, maximal CD4-mediated GVL requires cognate interactions between CD4 cells and mCP-CML cells as major histocompatibility complex-negative (MHC II(-/-)) mCP-CML is relatively GVL resistant. Nevertheless, a minority of CD4 recipients cleared MHC II(-/-) mCP-CML; thus, CD4 cells can also kill indirectly. CD4 GVL did not require target Fas expression. These results suggest that CPCML's GVL sensitivity may in part be explained by the minimal requirements for T-cell killing, and GVL-resistance may be related to MHC II expression.
由供体T细胞介导的移植物抗白血病(GVL)效应彻底改变了白血病的治疗方式。然而,有效的GVL效应仍难以与移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)区分开来,并且许多肿瘤对GVL具有抗性。旨在解决这些问题的小鼠研究受到了限制,一方面所使用的白血病细胞系与人类白血病的同源性有限,另一方面缺乏功能丧失的白血病变体。为了解决这些问题,我们开发了一种针对小鼠慢性期慢性粒细胞白血病(mCP-CML)的GVL模型,该模型由表达bcr-abl融合cDNA的逆转录病毒诱导产生,bcr-abl融合cDNA是慢性期CML(CP-CML)的决定性基因异常。通过在基因缺陷小鼠中产生mCP-CML,我们研究了GVL T细胞效应机制。CD8介导的GVL效应不需要mCP-CML表达Fas或肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)受体。令人惊讶的是,最大程度的CD4介导的GVL效应需要CD4细胞与mCP-CML细胞之间的同源相互作用,因为主要组织相容性复合体阴性(MHC II(-/-))的mCP-CML对GVL相对具有抗性。尽管如此,少数接受CD4细胞的小鼠清除了MHC II(-/-)的mCP-CML;因此,CD4细胞也可以间接杀伤。CD4介导的GVL效应不需要靶细胞表达Fas。这些结果表明,CPCML对GVL的敏感性部分可能是由于T细胞杀伤的最低要求所致,而GVL抗性可能与MHC II表达有关。