Smith E A, Malone R E
Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.
Tob Control. 2004 Mar;13(1):57-63. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.004275.
To analyse the development and execution of the "Creative Solutions" Benson & Hedges advertising campaign to understand its social, political, and commercial implications.
Searches of the Philip Morris documents and Legacy Tobacco Documents websites for relevant materials; Lexis/Nexis searches of major news and business publications; and denotative and connotative analyses of the advertising imagery.
Philip Morris developed the Creative Solutions campaign in an effort to directly confront the successes of the tobacco control movement in establishing new laws and norms that promoted clean indoor air. The campaign's imagery attempted to help smokers and potential smokers overcome the physical and social downsides of smoking cigarettes by managing risk and resolving internal conflict. The slogans suggested a variety of ways for smokers to respond to restrictions on their habit. The campaign also featured information about the Accommodation Program, Philip Morris's attempt to organise opposition to clean indoor air laws.
The campaign was a commercial failure, with little impact on sales of the brand. Philip Morris got some exposure for the Accommodation Program and its anti-regulatory position. The lack of commercial response to the ads suggests that they were unable to successfully resolve the contradictions that smokers were increasingly experiencing and confirms the power of changing social norms to counter tobacco industry tactics.
分析“创意解决方案”登喜路广告活动的开展与执行情况,以了解其社会、政治和商业影响。
在菲利普·莫里斯公司文件网站和遗留烟草文件网站上搜索相关资料;通过Lexis/Nexis搜索主要新闻和商业出版物;对广告意象进行外延和内涵分析。
菲利普·莫里斯公司开展“创意解决方案”活动,试图直接应对烟草控制运动在制定促进室内空气清洁的新法律和规范方面所取得的成功。该活动的意象试图通过管理风险和解决内心冲突,帮助吸烟者和潜在吸烟者克服吸烟在身体和社交方面的不利影响。口号为吸烟者应对吸烟习惯限制提供了多种方式。该活动还介绍了“ Accommodation Program”(适应计划),这是菲利普·莫里斯公司组织反对室内空气清洁法律的尝试。
该活动在商业上失败了,对该品牌的销售几乎没有影响。菲利普·莫里斯公司使“ Accommodation Program”及其反监管立场得到了一定曝光。广告缺乏商业反响表明,它们未能成功解决吸烟者日益面临的矛盾,也证实了不断变化的社会规范对抗烟草行业策略的力量。