Drouillard K G, Hagen H, Haffner G D
Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, ON, Canada N9B 3P4.
Chemosphere. 2004 Apr;55(3):395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.010.
Organic contaminant concentration data are often lipid normalized to provide an indication of the chemical fugacity in the sample or to compare the relative equilibrium status of samples from the same environment. This study compared lipid normalized PCB and organochlorine concentration data for tissues of individual fish when lipids were measured using chloroform/methanol (CM) or dichloromethane/hexane (DH) extractions. The CM extraction produced higher lipid yields for dorsal muscle (8-fold difference) and carcass (1.7-fold difference) compared to DH extractions, while both methods yielded comparable lipid contents for liver and adipose tissue. Lipid normalized tissue/carcass PCB and organochlorine concentration ratios were variable across tissue types when lipid contents from the CM technique were used, whereas, tissue/carcass concentration ratios approached the expected value of unity for each tissue when DH-derived lipids were used. These data suggest that the tissue lipid content as derived using the DH extraction provided a better surrogate measure of sample partition capacity than tissue lipids determined using the CM technique.
有机污染物浓度数据通常进行脂质归一化处理,以指示样品中的化学逸度,或比较来自同一环境的样品的相对平衡状态。本研究比较了使用氯仿/甲醇(CM)或二氯甲烷/己烷(DH)萃取法测量脂质时,单个鱼类组织的脂质归一化多氯联苯和有机氯浓度数据。与DH萃取法相比,CM萃取法使背肌(相差8倍)和鱼体(相差1.7倍)的脂质产量更高,而两种方法得到的肝脏和脂肪组织的脂质含量相当。当使用CM技术得到的脂质含量时,脂质归一化的组织/鱼体多氯联苯和有机氯浓度比在不同组织类型中有所不同,而当使用DH衍生的脂质时,每个组织的组织/鱼体浓度比接近预期的统一值。这些数据表明,与使用CM技术测定的组织脂质相比,使用DH萃取法得到的组织脂质含量能更好地替代样品分配能力的测量指标。