Smith S R, Lipsky M
Duke University.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1992 Summer;17(2):233-53. doi: 10.1215/03616878-17-2-233.
Privatization currently enjoys wide appeal as a solution to public problems. Supporters of privatization hope that shifting responsibility for the funding, administration, and delivery of services to private organizations and individuals will spur market competition and thus lower costs, improve service effectiveness, and enhance program quality. An increasingly common form of privatization in health and human services is contracting with nonprofit organizations. Such contracting, in practice, does not follow market principles but is, instead, fraught with politics and inadequate information and built on long-term relationships between government and contract agencies. The operations and practices of contracting have important implications for the ongoing debate on the desirability of vouchers for health care insurance and for reform in the contracting process.
目前,私有化作为解决公共问题的方案广受青睐。私有化的支持者希望,将服务的资金筹集、管理和提供责任转移给私人组织和个人,能够刺激市场竞争,从而降低成本、提高服务效率并提升项目质量。在卫生和公共服务领域,一种越来越常见的私有化形式是与非营利组织签约。实际上,这种签约并不遵循市场原则,而是充满了政治因素和信息不足的问题,并且建立在政府与合同机构之间的长期关系之上。签约的运作和实践对正在进行的关于医疗保险代金券的可取性以及签约过程改革的辩论具有重要影响。