Suppr超能文献

高山刺芹(伞形科)的遗传多样性与分化:AFLP和微卫星标记的比较

Genetic diversity and differentiation in Eryngium alpinum L. (Apiaceae): comparison of AFLP and microsatellite markers.

作者信息

Gaudeul M, Till-Bottraud I, Barjon F, Manel S

机构信息

Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, UMR CNRS 5553, Université J Fourier, BP 53, F-38041 Grenoble 09, France.

出版信息

Heredity (Edinb). 2004 Jun;92(6):508-18. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800443.

Abstract

Genetic diversity and structure of 12 populations of Eryngium alpinum L. were investigated using 63 dominant amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and seven codominant microsatellite (48 alleles) markers. Within-population diversity estimates obtained with both markers were not correlated, but the microsatellite-based fixation index Fis was correlated with both AFLP diversity indices (number of polymorphic bands and Nei's expected heterozygosity). Only AFLP diversity indices increased with the size of populations, although they did not significantly differ among them (Kruskall-Wallis test). The discrepancy between AFLPs and microsatellites may be explained by a better coverage of the genome with numerous AFLPs, the higher mutation rates of microsatellites or the absence of significant difference among within-population diversity estimates. Genetic differentiation was higher with AFLPs (theta=0.40) than with microsatellites (theta=0.23), probably due to the higher polymorphism of microsatellites. Thus, we considered global qualitative patterns rather than absolute estimates to compare the performance of both types of markers. On a large geographic scale, the Mantel test and multivariate analysis showed that genetic patterns were more congruent with the spatial arrangement of populations when inferred from microsatellites than from AFLPs, suggesting higher homoplasy of AFLP markers. On a small spatial scale, AFLPs managed to discriminate individuals from neighboring populations whereas microsatellites did not (multivariate analysis), and the percentage of individuals correctly assigned to their population of origin was higher with AFLPs than with microsatellites. However, dominant AFLPs cannot be used to study heterozygosity-related topics. Thus, distinct molecular markers should be used depending on the biological question and the geographical scale investigated.

摘要

利用63个显性扩增片段长度多态性(AFLP)标记和7个共显性微卫星(48个等位基因)标记,对12个高山刺芹种群的遗传多样性和结构进行了研究。两种标记获得的种群内多样性估计值不相关,但基于微卫星的固定指数Fis与两个AFLP多样性指数(多态性条带数和Nei氏期望杂合度)相关。只有AFLP多样性指数随种群大小增加,尽管它们在种群间没有显著差异(Kruskal-Wallis检验)。AFLP和微卫星之间的差异可能是由于众多AFLP对基因组的覆盖更好、微卫星的突变率更高或种群内多样性估计值之间没有显著差异。AFLP的遗传分化(θ=0.40)高于微卫星(θ=0.23),可能是由于微卫星的多态性更高。因此,我们考虑的是整体定性模式而非绝对估计值,以比较两种类型标记的性能。在大地理尺度上,Mantel检验和多变量分析表明,从微卫星推断的遗传模式比从AFLP推断的更符合种群的空间排列,这表明AFLP标记的同塑性更高。在小空间尺度上,AFLP能够区分相邻种群的个体,而微卫星则不能(多变量分析),并且AFLP将个体正确分配到其起源种群的百分比高于微卫星。然而,显性AFLP不能用于研究与杂合性相关的主题。因此,应根据生物学问题和所研究的地理尺度使用不同的分子标记。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验