Pukkila Patricia J
Department of Biology and Curriculum in Molecular Biology and Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280, USA.
Genetics. 2004 Jan;166(1):11-8. doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.1.11.
An appreciation of genetic principles depends upon understanding the individual curiosity that sparked particular investigations, the creativity involved in imagining alternative outcomes and designing experiments to eliminate these outcomes, and the clarity of thought necessary to convince one's scientific peers of the validity of the conclusions. At large research universities, students usually begin their study of genetics in large lecture classes. It is widely assumed that the lecture format, coupled with the pressures to be certain that students become familiar with the principal conclusions of genetics investigations, constrains most if not all departures from the formats textbooks used to explain these conclusions. Here I present several examples of mechanisms to introduce meaningful student inquiry in an introductory genetics course and to evaluate student creative effort. Most of the examples involve altered student preparation prior to class and additional in-class activities, while a few depend upon a smaller recitation section, which accompanies the course from which the examples have been drawn. I conclude that large introductory classes are suitable venues to teach students how to identify scientific claims, determine the evidence that is essential to eliminate alternative conclusions, and convince their peers of the validity of their arguments.
对遗传学原理的理解取决于了解引发特定研究的个人好奇心、想象不同结果并设计实验以排除这些结果所涉及的创造力,以及说服科学界同行相信结论有效性所需的清晰思维。在大型研究型大学中,学生通常在大型讲座课程中开始学习遗传学。人们普遍认为,讲座形式加上确保学生熟悉遗传学研究主要结论的压力,即使不是完全限制,也会极大地限制与用于解释这些结论的教科书形式的偏离。在这里,我展示了一些在遗传学入门课程中引入有意义的学生探究并评估学生创造性努力的机制示例。大多数示例涉及在课前改变学生的准备方式以及增加课堂活动,而少数示例则依赖于规模较小的复习课,这些复习课是从所举示例的课程中附带的。我得出的结论是,大型入门课程是教授学生如何识别科学主张、确定排除其他结论所需的证据以及说服同行相信其论点有效性的合适场所。