Abadie Eric, Ethgen Dominique, Avouac Bernard, Bouvenot Gilles, Branco Jaime, Bruyere Olivier, Calvo Gonzalo, Devogelaer Jean-Pierre, Dreiser Renee Lilianee, Herrero-Beaumont Gabriel, Kahan Andre, Kreutz Godfried, Laslop Andrea, Lemmel Ernst Martin, Nuki George, Van De Putte Leo, Vanhaelst Luc, Reginster Jean-Yves
Department of Registration and Clinical Studies, French Agency For the Safety of Health Products (AFSSAPS), France.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004 Apr;12(4):263-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2004.01.006.
Recent innovations in the pharmaceutical drug discovery environment have generated new chemical entities with the potential to become disease modifying drugs for osteoarthritis (DMOAD's). Regulatory agencies acknowledge that such compounds may be granted a DMOAD indication, providing they demonstrate that they can slow down disease progression; progression would be calibrated by a surrogate for structural change, by measuring joint space narrowing (JSN) on plain X-rays with the caveat that this delayed JSN translate into a clinical benefit for the patient. Recently, new technology has been developed to detect a structural change of the OA joint earlier than conventional X-rays.
The Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science (GREES) organized a working party to assess whether these new technologies may be used as surrogates to plain x-rays for assessment of DMOADs.
GREES includes academic scientists, members of regulatory authorities and representatives from the pharmaceutical industry. After an extensive search of the international literature, from 1980 to 2002, two experts meetings were organized to prepare a resource document for regulatory authorities. This document includes recommendations for a possible update of guidelines for the registration of new chemical entities in osteoarthritis.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is now used to measure parameters of cartilage morphology and integrity in OA patients. While some data are encouraging, correlation between short-term changes in cartilage structure observed with MRI and long-term radiographic or clinical changes are needed. Hence, the GREES suggests that MRI maybe used as an outcome in phase II studies, but that further data is needed before accepting MRI as a primary end-point in phase III clinical trials. Biochemical markers of bone and cartilage remodelling are being tested to predict OA and measure disease progression. Recently published data are promising but validation as surrogate end-points for OA disease progression requires additional study. The GREES suggests that biochemical markers remain limited to 'proof of concept' studies or as secondary end-points in phase II and III clinical trials. However, the GREES emphasizes the importance of acquiring additional information on biochemical markers in order to help better understand the mode of action of drugs to be used in OA. Regulatory agencies consider that evidence of improvement in clinical outcomes is critical for approval of DMOAD. Time to total joint replacement surgery is probably the most relevant clinical end-point for the evaluation of efficacy of a DMOAD. However, at this time, time to surgery can not be used in clinical trials because of bias by non disease-related factors like patient willingness for surgery or economic factors. At this stage, it appears that DMOAD should demonstrate a significant difference compared to placebo. Benefit should be measured by 3 co-primary end-points: JSN, pain and function. Secondary end-points should include the percentage of patients who are 'responder' (or 'failure'). The definition of a 'failure' patient would be someone with progression of JSN>0.5mm over a period of 2-3 years or who has a significant worsening in pain and/or function, based on validated cut-off values. The definition of the clinically relevant cut-off points for pain and function must be based on data evaluating the natural history of the disease (epidemiological cohorts or placebo groups from long-term studies). These cut-offs points should reflect a high propensity, for an individual patient, to later require joint replacement.
GREES has outlined a set of guidelines for the development of a DMOAD for OA. Although these guidelines are subject to change as new information becomes available, the information above is based on the present knowledge in the field with the addition of expert opinion.
药物研发环境的近期创新已产生了新的化学实体,它们有可能成为骨关节炎疾病修饰药物(DMOAD)。监管机构承认,此类化合物若能证明可减缓疾病进展,可能会被授予DMOAD适应症;疾病进展将通过结构变化的替代指标来衡量,即通过在普通X射线上测量关节间隙变窄(JSN),但前提是这种延迟的JSN能转化为患者的临床获益。最近,已开发出新技术,能够比传统X射线更早地检测出骨关节炎关节的结构变化。
科学伦理与卓越尊重小组(GREES)组织了一个工作组,以评估这些新技术是否可用作普通X射线的替代指标来评估DMOAD。
GREES包括学术科学家、监管机构成员和制药行业代表。在广泛检索1980年至2002年的国际文献后,组织了两次专家会议,为监管机构编写一份资源文件。该文件包括关于可能更新骨关节炎新化学实体注册指南的建议。
磁共振成像(MRI)现在用于测量骨关节炎患者软骨形态和完整性的参数。虽然一些数据令人鼓舞,但仍需要观察MRI观察到的软骨结构短期变化与长期影像学或临床变化之间的相关性。因此,GREES建议MRI可在II期研究中用作一个结果指标,但在将其接受为III期临床试验的主要终点之前,还需要更多数据。正在测试骨和软骨重塑的生化标志物,以预测骨关节炎并测量疾病进展。最近发表的数据很有前景,但作为骨关节炎疾病进展的替代终点进行验证还需要更多研究。GREES建议生化标志物仍仅限于“概念验证”研究,或作为II期和III期临床试验的次要终点。然而,GREES强调获取关于生化标志物的更多信息的重要性,以便更好地理解用于骨关节炎的药物的作用模式。监管机构认为,临床结局改善的证据对于DMOAD的批准至关重要。全关节置换手术的时间可能是评估DMOAD疗效最相关的临床终点。然而,目前,由于患者手术意愿或经济因素等非疾病相关因素的偏差,手术时间不能用于临床试验。在现阶段,似乎DMOAD应与安慰剂相比显示出显著差异。获益应通过3个共同主要终点来衡量:JSN、疼痛和功能。次要终点应包括“反应者”(或“失败者”)患者的百分比。“失败者”患者的定义为在2至3年期间JSN进展超过0.5mm的人,或根据经过验证的临界值,疼痛和/或功能有显著恶化的人。疼痛和功能的临床相关临界值的定义必须基于评估疾病自然史的数据(流行病学队列或长期研究中的安慰剂组)。这些临界值应反映个体患者日后需要关节置换的高可能性。
GREES已概述了一套用于骨关节炎DMOAD研发的指南。尽管随着新信息的出现这些指南可能会有所变化,但上述信息基于该领域的现有知识并加上了专家意见。