Suppr超能文献

在一家不进行会阴正中切开术的大学医学中心发生的三度会阴撕裂。

Third degree perineal tears in a university medical center where midline episiotomies are not performed.

作者信息

Sheiner Eyal, Levy Amalia, Walfisch Asnat, Hallak Mordechai, Mazor Moshe

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, P.O Box 151, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005 Apr;271(4):307-10. doi: 10.1007/s00404-004-0610-5. Epub 2004 Mar 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Midline episiotomy is a known major risk factor for severe perineal lacerations. The study was aimed to define obstetric risk factors for third-degree perineal tears in a university medical center where midline episiotomies are not performed.

STUDY DESIGN

A comparison between vaginal deliveries complicated with third-degree perineal tears and deliveries without third-degree perineal tears was performed. Deliveries occurred between the years 1988-1999 in a tertiary medical center. Multiple gestations, preterm deliveries (<37 weeks' gestation), cesarean deliveries and cases of shoulder dystocia were excluded from the analysis. A multiple logistic regression model was constructed in order to find independent risk factors for third-degree perineal tears. Odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated from the regression coefficient.

RESULTS

During the study period, 79 (0.1%) consecutive cases of third degree perineal tears were identified. Significant risk factors from the univariate analysis were fetal macrosomia (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2-5.5), nulliparity (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.8-4.6), labor induction (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.0-3.5), failure of labor to progress during the second stage (OR 10.8, 95% CI 5.4-21.1), non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns (OR 11.7, 95% CI 6.1-21.5), mediolateral episiotomy (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.8-4.5), vacuum extraction (OR 10.6, 95% CI 6.1-18.3), and forceps delivery (OR 29.2, 95% CI 7.3-97.2). However, using a multivariable analysis, only fetal macrosomia (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-4.9), vacuum extraction (OR 8.2, 95% CI 4.7-14.5), and forceps delivery (OR 26.7, 95% CI 8.0-88.5) remained as independent risk factors. The combined risk for instrumental deliveries of macrosomic newborns was 8.6 (95% CI 1.2-62.5; p=0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

After adjustment for possible confounding variables, mediolateral episiotomy per se was not an independent risk factor for third-degree perineal tears. Instrumental vaginal deliveries of macrosomic fetuses should be avoided whenever possible to decrease the occurrence of third-degree perineal tears.

摘要

目的

会阴正中切开术是导致严重会阴裂伤的一个已知主要危险因素。本研究旨在确定一所不施行会阴正中切开术的大学医学中心中三度会阴裂伤的产科危险因素。

研究设计

对并发三度会阴裂伤的阴道分娩与未发生三度会阴裂伤的分娩进行比较。分娩发生在1988年至1999年期间的一家三级医疗中心。分析排除了多胎妊娠、早产(妊娠<37周)、剖宫产和肩难产病例。构建了一个多因素逻辑回归模型,以找出三度会阴裂伤的独立危险因素。根据回归系数计算比值比(OR)及其95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

在研究期间,共确定了79例(0.1%)三度会阴裂伤连续病例。单因素分析的显著危险因素包括胎儿巨大(OR 2.7,95%CI 1.2 - 5.5)、初产(OR 2.9,95%CI 1.8 - 4.6)、引产(OR 1.9,95%CI 1.0 - 3.5)、第二产程产程停滞(OR 10.8,95%CI 5.4 - 21.1)、胎儿心率异常(OR 11.7,95%CI 6.1 - 21.5)、会阴侧切术(OR 2.8,95%CI 1.8 - 4.5)、真空吸引助产(OR 10.6,95%CI 6.1 - 18.3)和产钳助产(OR 29.2,95%CI 7.3 - 97.2)。然而,采用多变量分析时,只有胎儿巨大(OR 2.5,95%CI 1.2 - 4.9)、真空吸引助产(OR 8.2,95%CI 4.7 - 14.5)和产钳助产(OR 26.7,95%CI 8.0 - 88.5)仍然是独立危险因素。巨大儿器械助产的联合风险为8.6(95%CI 1.2 - 62.5;p = 0.010)。

结论

在对可能的混杂变量进行校正后,会阴侧切术本身并非三度会阴裂伤的独立危险因素。应尽可能避免对巨大胎儿进行器械阴道助产,以减少三度会阴裂伤的发生。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验