Broen Anne Nordal, Moum Torbjörn, Bödtker Anne Sejersted, Ekeberg Oivind
Department of Behavioral Sciences in Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Psychosom Med. 2004 Mar-Apr;66(2):265-71. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000118028.32507.9d.
To compare the psychological trauma reactions of women who had either a miscarriage or an induced abortion, in the 2 years after the event. Further, to identify important predictors of Impact of Event Scale (IES) scores.
A consecutive sample of women who experienced miscarriage (N = 40) or induced abortion (N = 80) were interviewed 3 times: 10 days (T1), 6 months (T2), and 2 years (T3) after the event.
At T1, 47.5% of the women who had a miscarriage were cases (IES score 19 points on 1 or both of the IES subscales), compared with 30% for women who had an induced abortion (p =.60). The corresponding values at T3 were 2.6% and 18.1%, respectively (p =.019). At all measurement time points, the group who had induced abortion scored higher on IES avoidance. Women who had a miscarriage were more likely to experience feelings of loss and grief, whereas women who had induced abortion were more likely to experience feelings of relief, guilt, and shame. At T3, IES intrusion was predicted by feelings of loss and grief at T1, whereas avoidance at T3 was predicted by guilt and shame at T1.
The short-term emotional reactions to miscarriage appear to be larger and more powerful than those to induced abortion. In the long term, however, women who had induced abortion reported significantly more avoidance of thoughts and feelings related to the event than women who had a miscarriage.
比较流产或人工流产女性在事件发生后2年内的心理创伤反应。此外,确定事件影响量表(IES)得分的重要预测因素。
对经历流产(N = 40)或人工流产(N = 80)的女性连续样本进行3次访谈:事件发生后10天(T1)、6个月(T2)和2年(T3)。
在T1时,47.5%的流产女性为病例(IES量表1个或2个分量表得分≥19分),而人工流产女性为30%(p = 0.60)。T3时的相应值分别为2.6%和18.1%(p = 0.019)。在所有测量时间点,人工流产组在IES回避分量表上得分更高。流产女性更有可能经历失落和悲伤情绪,而人工流产女性更有可能经历解脱、内疚和羞耻情绪。在T3时,IES闯入分量表得分由T1时的失落和悲伤情绪预测,而回避分量表得分由T1时的内疚和羞耻情绪预测。
流产后的短期情绪反应似乎比人工流产后的更强烈。然而,从长期来看,人工流产女性报告的对与该事件相关的想法和感受的回避明显多于流产女性。