De Leeuw I
Department of Endocrinology-Metabolism and Clinical Nutrition, University of Antwerp 1, Belgium.
Eur J Epidemiol. 1992 May;8 Suppl 1:125-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00145363.
Longitudinal studies have shown a large excess of cardiovascular mortality in insulin-dependent diabetic patients (IDDM) as compared to non-diabetic controls. Although diabetes appears to be an independent cardiovascular risk factor, increases in total and LDL-cholesterol together with a decrease of HDL-cholesterol are more pronounced in diabetics with cardiovascular disease. The general opinion, however, derived from a large number of cross-sectional studies, is that in well-controlled IDDM lipoprotein abnormalities are modest and only slightly different from matched non-diabetic controls. Most of the studies, however, used absolute criteria based on consensus statements and do not take the internal relations of the lipoproteins into account. When atherogenic indices (such as the relationship between total cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol or the Apo A1/apo B quotient) are used, 20 to 30% of an IDDM population considered to be in clinically acceptable control have to be considered pathological. This observation is even more important since the recent Diabetes Control and Complications Trial has shown that, especially in the younger group of patients, significantly higher total cholesterol and triglycerides and lower HDL-cholesterol were observed. Especially in these patients can diet and drug intervention be the most useful in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. These data are consistent with the fact that more sophisticated techniques have previously shown atherogenic changes in the composition of the VLDL-particles and lipoprotein enrichment in apo B. Since these techniques are not easily available in the clinic one has to refer to more classical techniques and the use of above mentioned atherogenic profiles to decide treatment.
纵向研究表明,与非糖尿病对照组相比,胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者(IDDM)的心血管死亡率大幅增加。尽管糖尿病似乎是一个独立的心血管危险因素,但在患有心血管疾病的糖尿病患者中,总胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的升高以及高密度脂蛋白胆固醇的降低更为明显。然而,从大量横断面研究得出的普遍观点是,在控制良好的IDDM中,脂蛋白异常程度较轻,与匹配的非糖尿病对照组仅有轻微差异。然而,大多数研究使用基于共识声明的绝对标准,并未考虑脂蛋白的内部关系。当使用致动脉粥样硬化指数(如总胆固醇与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇的关系或载脂蛋白A1/载脂蛋白B比值)时,20%至30%被认为临床控制良好的IDDM人群不得不被视为病理状态。这一观察结果更为重要,因为最近的糖尿病控制与并发症试验表明,尤其是在较年轻的患者组中,观察到总胆固醇和甘油三酯显著升高,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇降低。特别是在这些患者中,饮食和药物干预对预防心血管疾病最为有用。这些数据与以下事实一致,即更先进的技术此前已显示极低密度脂蛋白颗粒组成的致动脉粥样硬化变化以及载脂蛋白B中的脂蛋白富集。由于这些技术在临床上不易获得,人们不得不参考更经典的技术,并使用上述致动脉粥样硬化指标来决定治疗方案。