Dreicer Robert, Manola Judith, Roth Bruce J, See William A, Kuross Steven, Edelman Martin J, Hudes Gary R, Wilding George
Department of Hematology/Oncology and Urologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
Cancer. 2004 Apr 15;100(8):1639-45. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20123.
The regimens of carboplatin plus paclitaxel (CP) and methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC) were compared in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma were randomized to receive either CP (paclitaxel at a dose of 225 mg/m(2) and carboplatin [targeted area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 6] given every 21 days) or the standard M-VAC dosage.
Eighty-five patients were randomized to the respective treatment regimens (41 to CP and 44 to M-VAC). Response rates and overall survival were similar for both treatment arms. Patients treated with CP had an overall response rate of 28.2% (95% binomial confidence interval, 15.0-44.9%) compared with an overall response rate of 35.9% for the M-VAC arm (95% binomial confidence interval, 21.2-52.8%) (P = 0.63, Fisher exact test). The median progression-free survival among patients who were treated with M-VAC was 8.7 months and was 5.2 months for patients receiving CP (P = 0.24, log-rank test). At a median follow-up of 32.5 months, the median survival for patients treated with M-VAC was 15.4 months versus 13.8 months for patients treated with CP (P = 0.65, log-rank test). Patients treated with M-VAC were found to have more severe worst-degree toxicities compared with patients treated with CP (P = 0.0001). There were no significant differences with regard to quality of life as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bladder (FACT-BL) instrument (P = 0.33).
Interpretation of the results of this study must be made with caution because the study failed to reach its accrual goal. Patients treated with CP had a median survival of 13.8 months compared with 15.4 months for patients treated with M-VAC. Patients treated with CP appeared in general to better tolerate their treatment; however, there were no significant differences noted with regard to measured quality of life parameters.
对晚期尿路上皮癌患者比较了卡铂联合紫杉醇(CP)方案与甲氨蝶呤、长春碱、阿霉素和顺铂(M-VAC)方案。
将转移性尿路上皮癌患者随机分为两组,分别接受CP方案(紫杉醇剂量为225mg/m²,卡铂[浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)目标值为6],每21天给药一次)或标准M-VAC剂量方案。
85例患者被随机分配至相应治疗方案组(41例接受CP方案,44例接受M-VAC方案)。两个治疗组的缓解率和总生存期相似。接受CP方案治疗的患者总缓解率为28.2%(95%二项式置信区间,15.0 - 44.9%),而M-VAC方案组的总缓解率为35.9%(95%二项式置信区间,21.2 - 52.8%)(P = 0.63,Fisher精确检验)。接受M-VAC方案治疗的患者中位无进展生存期为8.7个月,接受CP方案治疗的患者为5.2个月(P = 0.24,对数秩检验)。在中位随访32.5个月时,接受M-VAC方案治疗的患者中位生存期为15.4个月,接受CP方案治疗的患者为13.8个月(P = 0.65,对数秩检验)。发现接受M-VAC方案治疗的患者与接受CP方案治疗的患者相比,有更严重的最高级毒性(P = 0.0001)。根据癌症治疗功能评估-膀胱(FACT-BL)工具评估的生活质量方面无显著差异(P = 0.33)。
由于本研究未达到入组目标,对本研究结果的解读必须谨慎。接受CP方案治疗的患者中位生存期为13.8个月,而接受M-VAC方案治疗的患者为15.4个月。接受CP方案治疗的患者总体上似乎对治疗耐受性更好;然而,在测量的生活质量参数方面未发现显著差异。