Suppr超能文献

甲氨蝶呤、长春碱、阿霉素和顺铂与卡铂和紫杉醇用于晚期尿路上皮癌患者的III期试验

Phase III trial of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin versus carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced carcinoma of the urothelium.

作者信息

Dreicer Robert, Manola Judith, Roth Bruce J, See William A, Kuross Steven, Edelman Martin J, Hudes Gary R, Wilding George

机构信息

Department of Hematology/Oncology and Urologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2004 Apr 15;100(8):1639-45. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20123.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The regimens of carboplatin plus paclitaxel (CP) and methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC) were compared in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma were randomized to receive either CP (paclitaxel at a dose of 225 mg/m(2) and carboplatin [targeted area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 6] given every 21 days) or the standard M-VAC dosage.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients were randomized to the respective treatment regimens (41 to CP and 44 to M-VAC). Response rates and overall survival were similar for both treatment arms. Patients treated with CP had an overall response rate of 28.2% (95% binomial confidence interval, 15.0-44.9%) compared with an overall response rate of 35.9% for the M-VAC arm (95% binomial confidence interval, 21.2-52.8%) (P = 0.63, Fisher exact test). The median progression-free survival among patients who were treated with M-VAC was 8.7 months and was 5.2 months for patients receiving CP (P = 0.24, log-rank test). At a median follow-up of 32.5 months, the median survival for patients treated with M-VAC was 15.4 months versus 13.8 months for patients treated with CP (P = 0.65, log-rank test). Patients treated with M-VAC were found to have more severe worst-degree toxicities compared with patients treated with CP (P = 0.0001). There were no significant differences with regard to quality of life as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bladder (FACT-BL) instrument (P = 0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Interpretation of the results of this study must be made with caution because the study failed to reach its accrual goal. Patients treated with CP had a median survival of 13.8 months compared with 15.4 months for patients treated with M-VAC. Patients treated with CP appeared in general to better tolerate their treatment; however, there were no significant differences noted with regard to measured quality of life parameters.

摘要

背景

对晚期尿路上皮癌患者比较了卡铂联合紫杉醇(CP)方案与甲氨蝶呤、长春碱、阿霉素和顺铂(M-VAC)方案。

方法

将转移性尿路上皮癌患者随机分为两组,分别接受CP方案(紫杉醇剂量为225mg/m²,卡铂[浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)目标值为6],每21天给药一次)或标准M-VAC剂量方案。

结果

85例患者被随机分配至相应治疗方案组(41例接受CP方案,44例接受M-VAC方案)。两个治疗组的缓解率和总生存期相似。接受CP方案治疗的患者总缓解率为28.2%(95%二项式置信区间,15.0 - 44.9%),而M-VAC方案组的总缓解率为35.9%(95%二项式置信区间,21.2 - 52.8%)(P = 0.63,Fisher精确检验)。接受M-VAC方案治疗的患者中位无进展生存期为8.7个月,接受CP方案治疗的患者为5.2个月(P = 0.24,对数秩检验)。在中位随访32.5个月时,接受M-VAC方案治疗的患者中位生存期为15.4个月,接受CP方案治疗的患者为13.8个月(P = 0.65,对数秩检验)。发现接受M-VAC方案治疗的患者与接受CP方案治疗的患者相比,有更严重的最高级毒性(P = 0.0001)。根据癌症治疗功能评估-膀胱(FACT-BL)工具评估的生活质量方面无显著差异(P = 0.33)。

结论

由于本研究未达到入组目标,对本研究结果的解读必须谨慎。接受CP方案治疗的患者中位生存期为13.8个月,而接受M-VAC方案治疗的患者为15.4个月。接受CP方案治疗的患者总体上似乎对治疗耐受性更好;然而,在测量的生活质量参数方面未发现显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验